Cited by 129Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese.

Open access
Cutler, Anne, Otake, Takashi·1999·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Three experiments addressed the question of whether pitch-accent information may be exploited in the process of recognizing spoken words in Tokyo Japanese. In a two-choice classification task, listeners judged from which of two words, differing in accentual structure, isolated syllables had been extracted (e.g., ka from baka HL or gaka LH); most judgments were correct, and listeners' decisions were correlated with the fundamental frequency characteristics of the syllables. In a gating experiment, listeners heard initial fragments of words and guessed what the words were; their guesses overwhelmingly had the same initial accent structure as the gated word even when only the beginning CV of the stimulus (e.g., na- from nagasa HLL or nagashi LHH) was presented. In addition, listeners were more confident in guesses with the same initial accent structure as the stimulus than in guesses with different accent. In a lexical decision experiment, responses to spoken words (e.g., ame HL) were speeded by previous presentation of the same word (e.g., ame HL) but not by previous presentation of a word differing only in accent (e.g., ame LH). Together these findings provide strong evidence that accentual information constrains the activation and selection of candidates for spoken-word recognition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.426724

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 129

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 1986, Forbear is a homophone: lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access, Language and Speech, 29, 201, 10.1177/002383098602900302 · DOI
  2. 1997, Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing, Percept. Psychophys., 59, 165, 10.3758/BF03211886 · DOI
  3. 1997, Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review, Language and Speech, 40, 141, 10.1177/002383099704000203 · DOI
  4. 1963, Intelligibility of tonic accents, Phonetica, 10, 203, 10.1159/000258171 · DOI
  5. 1996, Auditory lexical decision, Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 559, 10.1080/016909696386944 · DOI
  6. 1996, Gating, Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597, 10.1080/016909696386999 · DOI
  7. 1982, Perception of CV-syllables isolated from Japanese connected speech, Language and Speech, 25, 175, 10.1177/002383098202500204 · DOI
  8. 1991, The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon, Cognition, 38, 245, 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90008-R · DOI
  9. 1987, Parallel processing in spoken word recognition, Cognition, 25, 17
  10. 1994, Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features, Psychol. Rev., 101, 653, 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.653 · DOI
  11. 1981, Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 69, 559, 10.1121/1.385484 · DOI
  12. 1982, Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel-stop consonant-vowel sequences, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perf., 8, 473, 10.1037/0096-1523.8.3.473 · DOI
  13. 1986, The TRACE model of speech perception, Cogn. Psychol., 18, 1, 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · DOI
  14. 1994, Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cog., 20, 621, 10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.621 · DOI
  15. 1995, Role of prosodic features in the human process of perceiving spoken words and sentences in Japanese, J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn., 16, 311, 10.1250/ast.16.311 · DOI
  16. 1994, Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition, Cognition, 52, 189, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4 · DOI
  17. 1990, Rhythmic structure of Japanese and syllable structure, IEICE Technical Report, 89, 55
  18. 1993, Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese, Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 358
  19. 1996, The representation of Japanese moraic nasals, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100, 3831, 10.1121/1.417239 · DOI
  20. 1984, Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic structure, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 450, 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90291-3 · DOI
  21. 1961, Nihongo no akusento, (Japanese accent) Gengo Seikatsu, 117, 14
  22. 1997, Exploitation of stress information in spoken-word recognition in Dutch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 102, 3136, 10.1121/1.420647 · DOI
  23. 1995, Final accent vs. no accent: Utterance-final neutralization in Tokyo Japanese, Journal of Phonetics, 23, 487, 10.1006/jpho.1995.0035 · DOI
  24. 1997, Japanese final-accented and unaccented phrases, Journal of Phonetics, 25, 43, 10.1006/jpho.1996.0033 · DOI
  25. 1984, Subcategorical mismatches slow phonetic judgments, Percept. Psychophys., 35, 49, 10.3758/BF03205924 · DOI
  26. 1991, Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access, Percept. Psychophys., 50, 351, 10.3758/BF03212227 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cutler, A., & Otake, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
  • Dokkyo University (JP)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
1877-1888
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2061659505
Cited by
129
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Ohio State University
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
pitch accent, spoken word recognition, Tokyo Japanese, fundamental frequency, lexical decision, word recognition
MeSH terms
Humans, Japan, Phonetics, Pitch Perception, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review