The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A solution to diffraction biases in sonoelasticity: The acoustic impulse technique
Abstract
Several methods have been proposed to estimate the viscoelastic properties of soft biological tissues using forced low-frequency vibrations (10–500 Hz). Those methods are based on the measurement of phase velocity of the shear waves (∼5 m/s). It is shown in this article that the measurements of velocity as well as attenuation are subjected to biases. These biases are related to reflected waves created at boundaries, to the nonnegligible size of the piston source which causes diffraction effects and to the influence of a low-frequency compressional wave. Indeed, a theoretical analysis of the field radiated by a point source explains how mechanical vibrations of a piston generate a shear wave with a longitudinal component and how this component can interfere with a low-frequency compressional wave. However, by using a low-frequency transient excitation, these biases can be avoided. Then the precise numerical values of elasticity and viscosity can be deduced. Experiments in phantoms and beef muscles are shown. Moreover, a relative hardness imaging of a phantom composed of two media with different elasticities is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elastography imaging: the 30 year perspective
Ormachea, J., & Parker, K. J. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abca00 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Catheline, S., Wu, F., & Fink, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2941-2950
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1994930463
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A solution to diffraction biases in sonoelasticity: The acoustic impulse technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.426907
- The paper
- Catheline, S., Wu, F., & Fink, M. (1999). A solution to diffraction biases in sonoelasticity: The acoustic impulse technique. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.426907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.