The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantifying the Lombard effect in different background noises
Abstract
The Lombard effect of increasing one’s vocal effort in the presence of background noise has been quantified by Pearsons et al. (1977) as a 0.6-dB increase in speech levels for each dB increase in the background noise up to a ceiling level. Lombard speech has also been investigated in other studies with variable results. This study reports data on the effect of different noises on (1) the slope of the function relating speech levels and noise levels and (2) the spectral structure of speech. Twenty normal-hearing adults were asked to read aloud ten sentences from the hearing in noise test (HINT) to an experimenter seated 1 m away, in quiet and in various noises (white, speech spectrum, babble, and restaurant) presented in the sound field at 60 and 75 dBA. Preliminary findings show that increases in speech levels in natural environmental noises (restaurant and babble) most closely follow Pearsons’ data, with a slope of 0.6 dB. In contrast, artificial noises (speech spectrum and white) were associated with lower slopes (0.2 and 0.4 dB, respectively). Findings of this study could be useful in a wider context of modeling the complete speech communication process from talker to listener.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Conversely, the Lombard function for pink noise is approximately 0.4 dB/dB (Giguère et al., 2006; Pearson et al., 1976).”
From Perception of Physical Demand, Mental Demand, and Performance: A Comparison of Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease (2022) · cites this paper as Giguère et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Richardson, K., Huber, J. E., Kiefer, B., & Snyder, S. (2022) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00026 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Giguère, C., Laroche, C., Brault, É., Ste-Marie, J.-C., Brosseau-Villeneuve, M., Philippon, B., & Vaillancourt, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 5_Supplement
- Pages
- 3378-3378
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2086281649
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- Lombard effect, vocal effort, background noise, babble noise, restaurant noise, white noise, speech-spectrum noise, Hearing in Noise Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the Lombard effect in different background noises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.4781616
- The paper
- Giguère, C., Laroche, C., Brault, É., Ste-Marie, J.-C., Brosseau-Villeneuve, M., Philippon, B., & Vaillancourt, V. (2006). Quantifying the Lombard effect in different background noises. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4781616