Cited by 1Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionLinguistic Variation and Morphology

The effect of f o fall, downstep, and secondary cues in perceiving Japanese lexical accent

Open access
Sugiyama, Yukiko, Hui, C. T. Justine, Arai, Takayuki·2021·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Lexical pitch accent in Japanese is primarily realized as a steep fall in fo from an accented syllable into the following one. In addition, when a phrase that contains an accented syllable is followed by another phrase, the following phrase undergoes downstep, a compression of the fo range. Furthermore, while their acoustic identity is not yet clear, secondary cues to Japanese pitch accent are known to exist. The present study examined how speakers of Tokyo Japanese used acoustic information from these three sources in perceiving lexical pitch accent in Tokyo Japanese. Listeners heard stimuli in which the acoustic cues related to accent were independently manipulated and were asked to identify if a word presented sentence-medially was a final-accented word or its unaccented counterpart. Results found that listeners' judgments of words were most consistent with the presence or absence of downstep. That is, listeners identified that the preceding phrase contained an accented word when the following phrase was downstepped. Listeners also used the fo fall to determine if the word in question was a final-accented word or an unaccented word. Secondary cues to pitch accent were most weakly related to listeners' identification of accent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/10.0006689

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 1

Authors
Sugiyama, Y., Hui, C. T. J., & Arai, T.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Sophia University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sugiyama, Yukiko
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
150
Issue
4
Pages
2865-2878
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W3206776421
Cited by
1
References
15
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K00584)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
Japanese pitch accent, tone perception, downstep, Tokyo Japanese, accent recognition, acoustic cues
MeSH terms
Cues, Japan, Phonetics, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review