Recognition of spoken words with mispronounced lexical prosody in Japanese.
Open accessAbstract
Lexical prosody plays a crucial role in Japanese spoken word recognition. However, listeners of Japanese can still recognize spoken words easily even when they are pronounced with mispronounced lexical prosody, i.e., prosody that differs from their lexical knowledge. The present study investigated how listeners recognize spoken words pronounced with mispronounced lexical pitch accent in Japanese. Two cross-modal semantic priming experiments addressed the process of lexical access during listening to prosodically mispronounced words under a sentential context. When words were presented with mispronounced prosody, semantic priming effects that reflected the access to contextually congruent words were obtained not under interstimulus interval (ISI) = 0 ms (experiment 1) but under ISI = 750 ms (experiment 2). These results suggested that a prosodically mispronounced input temporarily disturbed access to the appropriate meaning of the word, whereas appropriate access was achieved later within 750 ms with reference to the contextual information rather than the mispronounced lexical prosodic information. Thus, contextual information overrides lexical prosodic information to recognize spoken words appropriately even when lexical prosody is mispronounced.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even slight shifts in the position of the accent nucleus can alter lexical meaning, making pitch accent crucial for intelligibility and naturalness.
“Even slight shifts in the position of the accent nucleus can alter lexical meaning, making it crucial for intelligibility and naturalness (e.g., the Japanese word 'hashi,' which means 'chopsticks' or 'bridge' depending on accent placement).”
From PASQA: Pitch-Accent-Focused Speech Quality Assessment Model Trained on Synthetic Speech with Accent Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In Japanese, pitch accent serves as a perceptual cue.
“For example, in Japanese, pitch accent serves as such a perceptual cue [8, 9].”
From PASQA: Pitch-Accent-Focused Speech Quality Assessment Model Trained on Synthetic Speech with Accent Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kawamura, M., Shirahata, Y., Mitsui, K., & Shimizu, R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.20137
“For example, in Japanese, pitch accent serves as such a perceptual cue [8, 9].”
- Authors
- Ariga, T., & Hirose, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- ORCID
- Hirose, Yuki
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2025-06-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4102-4118
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W4410996155
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- JSPS KAKENHI (19K21626, 24KJ0631)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- spoken word recognition, lexical prosody, Japanese pitch accent, lexical access, contextual information, interstimulus interval, sentence context
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Female, Humans, Japan, Language, Male, Phonetics, Pitch Perception, Semantics, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Time Factors, Voice Quality, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review