Disabling Prejudice: A Case Study of Images of Paralympic Athletes and Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities
Abstract
Part of the goal of the International Paralympic Committee is to “touch the heart of all people for a more equitable society” by exposing people to adaptive sports, with the goal of improving public views toward people with disabilities. The authors hypothesized that exposure to parasocial contact with images of athletes with disabilities could lead to a change in attitude during the formation of social identity, disrupting the tendency to view the population of individuals with physical disabilities as “other. ” This case study found that viewing a documentary of a Paralympic sprinter produced in the same style as an Olympic feature appeared to affect the emotional components of attitude formation, especially when compared with respondents who viewed a comparable documentary about an able-bodied athlete. These findings are of interest to proponents of adaptive sports, producers of adaptive-sports media, and marketers who use athletes with disabilities in advertising campaigns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
How people with disabilities are presented in media plays a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions and social norms.
“How people with disabilities (PwD) are presented in media plays a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions and social norms [34, 105], influencing livelihood through access to education and employment [47].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [105]
Visual media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion and social norms, including societal perceptions of disability.
“Visual media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion and social norms, including societal perceptions of disability [10, 34, 105, 117].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [105]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shelton, S. S., & Waddell, T. F. (2021) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2020.1808125 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation
Thieme, A., Faia Marques, R., Grayson, M., Balachandar, S., Tyler Cassidy, C., Choksi, M. Z., Longden, C., Huda, R. S., Ileve Kalovwe, N., Mallon, C., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790768 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“How people with disabilities (PwD) are presented in media plays a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions and social norms [34, 105], influencing livelihood through access to education and employment [47].”
- Authors
- Suggs, D. W., & Guthrie, J. L.
- Affiliations
- 1University of Georgia, USA
- University of Georgia (US)
- ORCID
- Guthrie, Jason Lee
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Communication
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 258-276
- ISSN
- 1936-3907 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-3915
- OpenAlex
- W2617877261
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sport Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Keywords
- Paralympic athletes, attitudes toward disability, prejudice reduction, parasocial contact, social identity construction, otherness, disability sports, media exposure, affective attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review