The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of Under-Reporting of Energy Intake by Elite Female Gymnasts
Abstract
This study examines the degree of under-reporting of energy intake by elite, female gymnasts, and the impact this predicted under-reporting has on associated macro and micro nutrient intake. Twenty-eight female U.S. national team artistic gymnasts participated in the study. Dietary intake was assessed using 3-day food records, and the degree of under-reporting was predicted from the ratio of reported energy intake (EI) to predicted basal metabolic rate (BMRestd), using the standards described by Goldberg et al. (10). Sixty-one percent of the subjects had an EI/BMRestd ratio of < 1.44, and were classified as under-reporters. The under-reporters had higher BMIs and percent body fat, and lower reported total energy intakes than the adequate energy reporters. Additionally, under-reporting of energy intake had a significant impact on reported micro nutrient intake. The under-reporting of energy intake seen in these subjects has an impact on the reported intake of macro and micro nutrients that can influence the interpretation of the nutritional status of these athletes and the strategy for nutrition intervention. Therefore, when assessing dietary intakes of elite gymnasts, some means of determining the accuracy of the reported energy and nutrient intake should be employed to more accurately identify the true nutritional problems experienced by these elite athletes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of note, existing literature also demonstrates substantial variability between dietary assessment methods with under- and misreporting of dietary intake [87, 88].”
From Nutritional Status and Cardiovascular Health in Female Adolescent Elite-Level Artistic Gymnasts and Swimmers: A Cross-Sectional Study of 31 Athletes (2021) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“This issue is especially relevant for female artistic gymnasts because of known problems with under-reporting of energy intake by elite-level female gymnasts [88].”
From Nutritional Status and Cardiovascular Health in Female Adolescent Elite-Level Artistic Gymnasts and Swimmers: A Cross-Sectional Study of 31 Athletes (2021) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparison of strategies for assessing nutritional adequacy in elite female athletes’ dietary intake
Heaney, S., O’Connor, H., Gifford, J., & Naughton, G. (2010) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.20.3.245 · Cited by 95
Use of Dietary Supplements by Elite Figure Skaters
Ziegler, P. J., Nelson, J. A., & Jonnalagadda, S. S. (2003) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.13.3.266 · Cited by 63
Self-citationJakše, B., Jakše, B., Mis, N. F., Jug, B., Šajber, D., Godnov, U., & Čuk, I. (2021) · Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1155/2021/8810548 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonnalagadda, S. S., Benardot, D., & Dill, M. N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-325
- ISSN
- 1526-484X
- 1543-2742
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Under-Reporting of Energy Intake by Elite Female Gymnasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1123/ijsnem.10.3.315
- The paper
- Jonnalagadda, S. S., Benardot, D., & Dill, M. N. (2000). Assessment of Under-Reporting of Energy Intake by Elite Female Gymnasts. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.10.3.315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.