Nutrition knowledge, opinions, and practices of coaches and athletic trainers at a division I university
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to assess nutrition knowledge, opinions, and practices of coaches and trainers at a Division I university. Participants (n = 53) completed questionnaires regarding nutrition knowledge, opinions, and practices. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to analyze data. Overall, participants responded correctly to 67% of nutrition knowledge questions. Participants who coached/trained female athletes tended to score better than respondents who coached/trained male athletes. Strength and conditioning coaches and participants with greater than 15 years of experience scored higher than other participants. Nutrition opinions/practices responses revealed that nutritional supplements were provided for all but 6% of participants' athletes. Participants rated body weight as more important than body composition to athletes' performances. Over 30% of participants perceived at least one case of disordered eating within the past year. Some participants (53%) felt that athletes may consume more nutritious meals on team-sponsored trips if given larger food allowances. Thirty percent of participants reported dietitians were available to them; the same percentage reported utilizing dietitians. Coaches and trainers are knowledgeable about some appropriate nutritional recommendations, but registered dietitians or qualified sports nutrition professionals may complement the nutrition-related education and counseling of athletes (23).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In general, physically active people do not need additional nutrients apart from those obtained from a balanced diet.
“However, it is known that, in general, physically active people do not need additional nutrients apart from those obtained from a balanced diet [8][9][10].”
From Intake of nutritional supplements among people exercising in gyms and influencing factors (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Rockwell, M. S., Nickols-Richardson, S. M., & Thye, F. W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-185
- ISSN
- 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2742
- OpenAlex
- W2156064167
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- nutrition knowledge, coaches, athletic trainers, college athletes, dietary habits, dietary supplements, disordered eating, body weight, body composition, strength and conditioning coaches, dietitians, food allowance, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Body Composition, Body Weight, Data Collection, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sports, Sports Medicine, Teaching, Universities, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review