Cited by 129Dietetics, Nutrition, and EducationNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

Nutrition knowledge, opinions, and practices of coaches and athletic trainers at a division I university

Rockwell, Michelle Smith, Nickols-Richardson, Sharon M., Thye, Forrest W.·2001·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to assess nutrition knowledge, opinions, and practices of coaches and trainers at a Division I university. Participants (n = 53) completed questionnaires regarding nutrition knowledge, opinions, and practices. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to analyze data. Overall, participants responded correctly to 67% of nutrition knowledge questions. Participants who coached/trained female athletes tended to score better than respondents who coached/trained male athletes. Strength and conditioning coaches and participants with greater than 15 years of experience scored higher than other participants. Nutrition opinions/practices responses revealed that nutritional supplements were provided for all but 6% of participants' athletes. Participants rated body weight as more important than body composition to athletes' performances. Over 30% of participants perceived at least one case of disordered eating within the past year. Some participants (53%) felt that athletes may consume more nutritious meals on team-sponsored trips if given larger food allowances. Thirty percent of participants reported dietitians were available to them; the same percentage reported utilizing dietitians. Coaches and trainers are knowledgeable about some appropriate nutritional recommendations, but registered dietitians or qualified sports nutrition professionals may complement the nutrition-related education and counseling of athletes (23).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.11.2.174

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, physically active people do not need additional nutrients apart from those obtained from a balanced diet.

    “However, it is known that, in general, physically active people do not need additional nutrients apart from those obtained from a balanced diet [8][9][10].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 129

Authors
Rockwell, M. S., Nickols-Richardson, S. M., & Thye, F. W.
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2001-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
174-185
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2156064167
Cited by
129
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
nutrition knowledge, coaches, athletic trainers, college athletes, dietary habits, dietary supplements, disordered eating, body weight, body composition, strength and conditioning coaches, dietitians, food allowance, gender differences
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Body Weight, Data Collection, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sports, Sports Medicine, Teaching, Universities, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review