Cited by 153Coffee research and impactsThermoregulation and physiological responsesExercise and Physiological Responses

Caffeine, Body Fluid-Electrolyte Balance, and Exercise Performance

Open access
Armstrong, Lawrence E.·2002·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

Recreational enthusiasts and athletes often are advised to abstain from consuming caffeinated beverages (CB). The dual purposes of this review are to (a) critique controlled investigations regarding the effects of caffeine on dehydration and exercise performance, and (b) ascertain whether abstaining from CB is scientifically and physiologically justifiable. The literature indicates that caffeine consumption stimulates a mild diuresis similar to water, but there is no evidence of a fluid-electrolyte imbalance that is detrimental to exercise performance or health. Investigations comparing caffeine (100-680 mg) to water or placebo seldom found a statistical difference in urine volume. In the 10 studies reviewed, consumption of a CB resulted in 0-84% retention of the initial volume ingested, whereas consumption of water resulted in 0-81% retention. Further, tolerance to caffeine reduces the likelihood that a detrimental fluid-electrolyte imbalance will occur. The scientific literature suggests that athletes and recreational enthusiasts will not incur detrimental fluid-electrolyte imbalances if they consume CB in moderation and eat a typical U.S. diet. Sedentary members of the general public should be at less risk than athletes because their fluid losses via sweating are smaller.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.12.2.189

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have not supported the concern that ingestion of caffeine prior to exercise may contribute to dehydration.

    “Some concern has been expressed that ingestion of caffeine prior to exercise may contribute to dehydration, although several studies have not supported this concern [430, 445, 446].”
  • Single doses of caffeine of about 100-600 mg consumed prior to exercise did not lead to a significant increase in urinary volume or a significantly different water retention during dehydration, and did not induce adverse water-electrolyte imbalances compared with water or placebo, particularly in habitual caffeine consumers.

    “Single doses of caffeine of about 100-600 mg consumed prior to exercise, however, did not lead to a significant increase in urinary volume or a significantly different water retention during dehydration, and did not induce adverse water-electrolyte imbalances compared with water or placebo, particularly in habitual caffeine consumers (Armstrong, 2002).”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Armstrong, 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 153

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]1. Armstrong, L.E. Diuretics. In: Performance-Enhancing Substances in Sport and Exercise, M.S. Bahrke and C.E. Yessalis (Eds.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, in press.
  2. [10]10. Berning, J.L., and S.N. Steen. Nutrition for Sport and Exercise. Aspen, CO: Aspen, 1998, pp. 122-123.
  3. [16]16. Carey B. Water myth hard to swallow. We don't need 64 ounces a day, experts insist. Denver Post (Rockies ed.), Jan. 2, 2001, p. E-01.
  4. [20]20. Conlee, R.K. Amphetamines, caffeine, and cocaine. In: Perspectives in Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Volume 4, Ergogenics—Enhancement of Performance in Exercise and Sport, D.R. Lamb and M.H. Williams (Eds.). Carmel, IN: Benchmark Press, 1990, pp. 285-328.
  5. [29]29. Fahey, T.D. Pharmacology of bodybuilding. In: The Clinical Pharmacology of Sport and Exercise, T. Reilly and M. Orme (Eds.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Excerpta Medica, 1997, pp. 145-153.
  6. [33]33. Fredholm, B.B. Cardiovascular and renalactionsof methylxanthines. In: The Methylxanthine Beverages and Foods: Chemistry, Composition, and Health Effects, G.A. Spiller (Ed.). New York: Alan R. Liss, 1984, pp. 303-330.
  7. [34]34. Fülgraff, F. Niere und Nierenfunktion. In: Kaffe und Coffein, O. Eichler (Ed.). Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1976, pp.175-184.
  8. [35]35. Ganong, W.F.Review ofMedical Physiology (10th ed.). Los Altos, CA: Lange Medical, 1981, pp. 22-25.
  9. [36]36. Gilbert, R.M. Caffeine consumption. In: The Methylxanthine Beverages and Foods: Chemistry, Composition, and Health Effects, G.A. Spiller (Ed.). New York: Alan R. Liss, 1984, pp.185-213.
  10. [41]41. Graham, T.E. The possible actions of methylxanthines on various tissues. In: The Clinical Pharmacology of Sport and Exercise, T.Reilly, and M. Orme (Eds.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Excerpta Medica, 1997, pp. 257-269.
  11. [49]49. Hubbard, R.W., P.C. Szlyk, and L.E. Armstrong. Influence of thirst and fluid palatability on fluid ingestion during exercise. In: Perspectives in Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Volume 3, Fluid Homeostasis During Exercise, C.V. Gisolfi and D.R. Lamb (Eds.). Carmel, IN: Benchmark Press, 1990, pp. 39-96.
  12. [52]52. Lentner, C. (Ed.). Geigy Scientific Tables, Volume 1. West Caldwell, NJ: Ciba-Geigy, 1981.
  13. [53]53. Linder, L. Water, water everywhere: despite the dire warnings of some interest groups, chances are you're getting enough. The Washington Post (final ed.), Dec. 15, 1998, p. Z16.
  14. [13]13. 60.National Research Council. Recommended Dietary Allowances (10th ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1989.
  15. [72]72. Smith, B.G. (Ed.). The 1988–89 NCAA Drug Testing Program. Mission, KS: National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1988.
  16. [73]73. Spindel, E. Action of the methylxanthines on the pituitary and pituitary-dependent hormones. In: The Methylxanthine Beverages and Foods: Chemistry, Composition, and Health Effects, G.A. Spiller (Ed.). New York: Alan R. Liss, 1984, pp. 355-363.

Authors
Armstrong, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, Lawrence E.
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2002-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
189-206
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2232773861
Cited by
153
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
caffeine, caffeinated beverages, dehydration, fluid and electrolyte balance, exercise performance, diuresis, urine output, fluid retention, caffeine tolerance, athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Body Fluids, Caffeine, Female, Humans, Male, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review