Cited by 91Sports Performance and TrainingThermoregulation and physiological responsesExercise and Physiological Responses

Increased blood pH but not performance with sodium bicarbonate supplementation in elite rugby union players

Cameron, Sonya L., McLay-Cooke, Rebecca T., Brown, Rachel C., Gray, Andrew R., Fairbairn, Kirsty A.·2010·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the effect of ingesting 0.3 g/kg body weight (BW) of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) on physiological responses, gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability, and sprint performance in elite rugby union players. Methods Twenty-five male rugby players, age 21.6 (2.6) yr, participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Sixty-five minutes after consuming 0.3 g/kg BW of either NaHCO₃ or placebo, participants completed a 25-min warm-up followed by 9 min of high-intensity rugby-specific training followed by a rugby-specific repeated-sprint test (RSRST). Whole-blood samples were collected to determine lactate and bicarbonate concentrations and pH at baseline, after supplement ingestion, and immediately after the RSRST. Acute GI discomfort was assessed by questionnaire throughout the trials, and chronic GI discomfort was assessed during the 24 hr postingestion. Results After supplement ingestion and immediately after the RSRST, blood HCO₃⁻ concentration and pH were higher for the NaHCO₃ condition than for the placebo condition (p Conclusions NaHCO₃ supplementation increased blood HCO₃⁻ concentration and attenuated the decline in blood pH compared with placebo during high-intensity exercise in well-trained rugby players but did not significantly improve exercise performance. The higher incidence and greater severity of GI symptoms after ingestion of NaHCO₃ may negatively affect physical performance, and the authors strongly recommend t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.20.4.307

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 91

Authors
Cameron, S. L., McLay-Cooke, R. T., Brown, R. C., Gray, A. R., & Fairbairn, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2010-08
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
307-321
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2104696204
Cited by
91
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Otago
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
sodium bicarbonate supplementation, rugby union players, blood pH, blood bicarbonate, blood lactate, gastrointestinal tolerance, repeated sprint performance, high-intensity exercise, elite athletes
MeSH terms
Acid-Base Equilibrium, Bicarbonates, Double-Blind Method, Football, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Running, Sodium Bicarbonate, Cross-Over Studies, Lactic Acid, Dietary Supplements, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review