The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doping Through Supplement Use: A Review of the Available Empirical Data
Abstract
The potential for supplement use to result in doping infringements is likely to be of concern for anyone involved in sports nutrition. The available data indicates that between 40–70% of athletes use supplements, and that between 10–15% of supplements may contain prohibited substances. Such data indicates that there is a considerable risk of accidental or inadvertent doping through using supplements. Accordingly, this paper sets out to provide an overview of the currently available empirical evidence of accidental doping by supplement use. In carrying out this task, the authors refer to press releases and proxy measures associated with nutritional supplement use, as well as statistical data on supplement contamination rates and doping infractions. A number of different indications as to the percentage of doping cases that might be attributed to supplement use are presented, ranging from 6.4% to 8.8%. Such percentages are not comparable; instead they are provided as indications as to how difficult it is to ascertain or estimate the scale of this problem. Although some forms of estimation can be made, it is suggested that it is currently not possible to quantify the scale of the problem. By way of conclusion, it is argued that antidoping regulators may wish to review current data gathering and information provision systems so that the problem of inadvertent doping can be more directly assessed as a factor in sports doping overall.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition to widely varying ingredient contents, dietary supplements may also be contaminated with banned substances.”
From How reliable is the labeling of a commercial phytosteroid product? A 12-week randomized double-blind training study (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“It is estimated that 6.4–8.8% of positive doping cases can be attributed to the use of contaminated dietary supplements [31–33].”
From How reliable is the labeling of a commercial phytosteroid product? A 12-week randomized double-blind training study (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Ikwuka, D. C., Nuhu, A., Usman, I. M., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11138233/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Outram, S., & Stewart, B.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Outram, Simon
- ORCID
- Outram, Simon
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-59
- ISSN
- 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2742
- OpenAlex
- W2114251728
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 29.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
- Keywords
- dietary supplements, doping, prohibited substances, supplement contamination, sports nutrition, athletes
- MeSH terms
- Doping in Sports, Food Contamination, Humans, International Agencies, Databases, Factual, Guidelines as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Internet, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review