Cited by 72Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Induced Alkalosis and Caffeine Supplementation: Effects on 2,000-m Rowing Performance

Carr, Amelia J., Gore, Christopher J., Dawson, Brian·2011·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of ingested caffeine, sodium bicarbonate, and their combination on 2,000-m rowing performance, as well as on induced alkalosis (blood and urine pH and blood bicarbonate concentration [HCO3-]), blood lactate concentration ([La-]), gastrointestinal symptoms, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Methods In a double-blind, crossover study, 8 well-trained rowers performed 2 baseline tests and 4 × 2,000-m rowing-ergometer tests after ingesting 6 mg/kg caffeine, 0.3 g/kg body mass (BM) sodium bicarbonate, both supplements combined, or a placebo. Capillary blood samples were collected at preingestion, pretest, and posttest time points. Pairwise comparisons were made between protocols, and differences were interpreted in relation to the likelihood of exceeding the smallest worthwhile-change thresholds for each variable. A likelihood of >75% was considered a substantial change. Results Caffeine supplementation elicited a substantial improvement in 2,000-m mean power, with mean (± SD) values of 354 ± 67 W vs. placebo with 346 ± 61 W. Pretest [HCO3-] reached 29.2 ± 2.9 mmol/L with caffeine + bicarbonate and 29.1 ± 1.9 mmol/L with bicarbonate. There were substantial increases in pretest [HCO3-] and pH and posttest urine pH after bicarbonate and caffeine + bicarbonate supplementation compared with placebo, but unclear performance effects. Conclusions Rowers' performance in 2,000-m efforts can improve by ~2% with…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.21.5.357

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 72

Authors
Carr, A. J., Gore, C. J., & Dawson, B.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2011-10
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
357-364
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2168351775
Cited by
72
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Institute of Sport
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
caffeine supplementation, sodium bicarbonate, rowing performance, blood bicarbonate, blood lactate, gastrointestinal symptoms, rating of perceived exertion, ergogenic aids
MeSH terms
Alkalosis, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Double-Blind Method, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Ships, Sports, Sodium Bicarbonate, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review