The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energetics of Shuttle Runs: The Effects of Distance and Change of Direction
Abstract
Shuttle runs can be used to study the physiological responses in sports (such as basketball) characterized by sprints (accelerations/decelerations) and changes of direction. Purpose: To determine the energy cost (C) of shuttle runs with different turning angles and over different distances (with different acceleration/deceleration patterns). Methods: Nine basketball players were asked to complete 6 intermittent tests over different distances (5, 10, 25 m) and with different changes of direction (180° at 5 and 25 m; 0°, 45°, 90°, and 180° at 10 m) at maximal speed (v ≍ 4.5 m/s), each composed by 10 shuttle runs of 10-s duration and 30-s recovery; during these runs oxygen uptake (VO 2), blood lactate (La b), and C were determined. Results: For a given shuttle distance (10 m) no major differences where observed in VO 2 (~33 mL · min−1 · kg−1), La b (~3.75 mM), and C (~21.2 J · m−1 · kg−1) when the shuttle runs were performed with different turning angles. For a given turning angle (180°), VO 2 and La b were found to increase with the distance covered (VO 2 from 26 to 35 mL · min−1 · kg−1; La b from 0.7 to 7.6 mM) while C was found to decrease with it (from 29.9 to 10.6 J · m−1 · kg−1); the relationship between C and d (m) is well described by C = 92.99 × d0.656, R2 = .971. Conclusions: The metabolic demands of shuttle tests run at maximal speeds can be estimated based on the running distance, while the turning angle plays a minor role in determining C.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Zamparo and colleagues (2014) showed that shuttles with full inversion (180 deg), when compared with other runs with just the straight (0 deg) stopand-go, resulted (non-significantly, though) in about +0.9 J kg -1 m -1 metabolic cost, in shuttle runs of 10 m (corresponding to about 9.0 J kg -1 turn -1 ).”
From Update and extension of the ‘Equivalent Slope’ of speed changing level locomotion in humans: a computational model for shuttle running (2018) · cites this paper as Zamparo et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes
Minetti, A. E., Moia, C., Roi, G. S., Susta, D., & Ferretti, G. (2002) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01177.2001 · Cited by 624
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Drinkwater EJ, 2008, Sports Med., 38, 565, 10.2165/00007256-200838070-00004 · DOI
- Ben Abdelkrim N, 2007, Br J Sports Med., 41, 69, 10.1136/bjsm.2006.032318 · DOI
- Ben Abdelkrim N, 2010, J Strength Cond Res., 24, 2652, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e2e0a3 · DOI
- Ben Abdelkrim N, 2010, J Strength Cond Res., 24, 2330, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e381c1 · DOI
- McInnes SE, 1995, J Sports Sci., 13, 387, 10.1080/02640419508732254 · DOI
- Zadro I, 2011, J Strength Cond Res., 25, 1767, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181da85d1 · DOI
- Narazaki K, 2009, Scand J Med Sci Sports., 19, 425, 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00789.x · DOI
- Scanlan A, 2011, J Sports Sci., 29, 1153, 10.1080/02640414.2011.582509 · DOI
- Buglione A, 2013, Eur J Appl Physiol., 113, 1535, 10.1007/s00421-012-2580-9 · DOI
- Minetti AE, 2001, Am Zool., 41, 205
- Minetti AE, 2013, J Appl Physiol., 114, 498, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2012 · DOI
- di Prampero PE, 2005, J Exp Biol., 208, 2809, 10.1242/jeb.01700 · DOI · Paper page
- Hewit JK, 2013, J Strength Cond Res., 27, 69, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f202d · DOI
- Schot P, 1995, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther., 22, 254, 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.6.254 · DOI
- Wasserman K, 1973, J Appl Physiol., 35, 236, 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.2.236 · DOI
- di Prampero PE, 1999, Respir Physiol., 118, 103, 10.1016/S0034-5687(99)00083-3 · DOI
- di Prampero PE, 1986, Int J Sports Med., 7, 55, 10.1055/s-2008-1025736 · DOI
- Margaria R, 1969, J Appl Physiol., 26, 752, 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.6.752 · DOI
- Linossier MT, 1997, Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol., 75, 491, 10.1007/s004210050194 · DOI
- MacDougall JD, 1998, J Appl Physiol., 84, 2138, 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.6.2138 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Minetti, A. E., & Pavei, G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.182303 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Zamparo, P., Zadro, I., Lazzer, S., Beato, M., & Sepulcri, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1033-1039
- ISSN
- 1555-0265
- 1555-0273
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review