The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are the World Junior Championship Finalists for Middle- and Long-Distance Events Currently Competing at International Level?
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze how many finalists of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) World Junior Championships (WJCs) in the middle- and long-distance track events had dropped out from high-level competitions. Methods: Starting from 2002, the 8 male and the 8 female finalists in the middle- and long-distance events of 6 editions of the WJC were followed until 2015 to evaluate how many missed the IAAF rankings for 2 consecutive years starting from the year after WJC participation. For those still competing at elite level, their careers were monitored. Results: In 2015, 61% of the 2002, 54.8% of the 2004, 48.3% of the 2006, 37.5% of the 2008, 26.2% of the 2010, and 29% of the 2012 WJC finalists were not present in the IAAF rankings. Of the 368 athletes considered, 75 (20.4%) were able to achieve the IAAF top 10 in 2.4 ± 2.2 y. There is evidence of relationships between dropout and gender (P = .040), WJC edition (P = .000), and nationality (P = .010) and between the possibility to achieve the IAAF top 10 and dropout (P = .000), continent (P = .001), relative age effect (P = .000), and quartile of birth (P = .050). Conclusions: Even if 23 of the finalists won a medal at the Olympic Games or at the World Championships, it is still not clear if participation at the WJC is a prerequisite to success at a senior level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Given the pathway to elite adult performance is multifaceted [2] and non-linear (i.e., success at junior levels infrequently predicting elite adult performance [3]), sound nutrition supporting holistic athlete health is of utmost importance during this period.”
From Youth Athlete Development and Nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Given the pathway to elite adult performance is multifaceted [2] and non-linear (i.e., success at junior levels infrequently predicting elite adult performance [3]), sound nutrition supporting holistic athlete health is of utmost importance during this period.”
From Youth Athlete Development and Nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“It is also important to recognize that athletic performance development is nonlinear, with success at junior competitions infrequently translating to success at Olympic or World Athletics Championships (Pizzuto et al., 2017).”
From Nutrition for Special Populations: Young, Female, and Masters Athletes (2019) · cites this paper as Pizzuto et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Youth Athlete Development and Nutrition
Desbrow, B. (2021) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01534-6 · Cited by 159
Nutrition for Special Populations: Young, Female, and Masters Athletes
Desbrow, B., Burd, N. A., Tarnopolsky, M., Moore, D. R., & Elliott-Sale, K. J. (2019) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0269 · Cited by 100
Alcock, R., Hislop, M., Vidgen, H. A., & Desbrow, B. (2024) · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · doi:10.3390/jfmk9040221 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Pizzuto, F., Bonato, M., Vernillo, G., La Torre, A., & Piacentini, M. F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 316-321
- ISSN
- 1555-0265
- 1555-0273
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.