Cited by 103Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Education and Training Studies

Strength Training for Middle- and Long-Distance Performance: A Meta-Analysis

Berryman, Nicolas, Mujika, Iñigo, Arvisais, Denis, Roubeix, Marie, Binet, Carl, Bosquet, Laurent·2018·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

Purpose To assess the net effects of strength training on middle- and long-distance performance through a meta-analysis of the available literature. Methods Three databases were searched, from which 28 of 554 potential studies met all inclusion criteria. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated and weighted by the inverse of variance to calculate an overall effect and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine whether the strength-training intensity, duration, and frequency and population performance level, age, sex, and sport were outcomes that might influence the magnitude of the effect. Results The implementation of a strength-training mesocycle in running, cycling, cross-country skiing, and swimming was associated with moderate improvements in middle- and long-distance performance (net SMD [95%CI] = 0.52 [0.33-0.70]). These results were associated with improvements in the energy cost of locomotion (0.65 [0.32-0.98]), maximal force (0.99 [0.80-1.18]), and maximal power (0.50 [0.34-0.67]). Maximal-force training led to greater improvements than other intensities. Subgroup analyses also revealed that beneficial effects on performance were consistent irrespective of the athletes' level. Conclusion Taken together, these results provide a framework that supports the implementation of strength training in addition to traditional sport-specific training to improve middle- and long-distance performance, mainly through improvements i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0032

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berryman, N., Mujika, I., Arvisais, D., Roubeix, M., Binet, C., & Bosquet, L.
Affiliations
  • Bishop's University (CA)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Poitiers (FR)
  • Laboratoire Mobilité Vieillissement et Exercice (FR)
Corresponding author
Bosquet, Laurent
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
57-64
ISSN
  • 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-0273
OpenAlex
W2610837315
Cited by
103
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
resistance training, middle-distance running, energy cost of locomotion, maximum power, maximal strength, endurance athletes, running, cycling, cross-country skiing, swimming, exercise intensity, mesocycle
MeSH terms
Bicycling, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Physical Endurance, Running, Skiing, Swimming, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review