The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Issues in Quantifying Variability from a Dynamical Systems Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Variability is a critical aspect of a dynamical systems analysis. Because there are a number of numerical techniques that can be used in such an analysis, the calculation of variability has several issues that must be addressed. The purpose of this paper is to present a variety of quantitative methods for investigating variability from a dynamical systems perspective. The paper is divided into two major sections covering discrete and continuous methods. Each of these sections is subdivided into two sections. Within discrete methods, we discuss, first, the calculation of the discrete relative phase from a time-series history of two parameters and, second, the use of return maps. Using continuous methods, we present procedures for using angle-angle plots in the evaluation of relative phase. We then discuss the use of phase plots in the calculation of the continuous relative phase. Each of these methods presents unique problems for the researcher and the method to be used is determined by the nature of the question asked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
May, R. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261459a0 · Cited by 7,001
Circular Statistics in Biology
Watson, G. S., & Batschelet, E. (1982) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267831 · Cited by 4,587
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/h0078016 · Cited by 3,183
Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior
(1997) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(97)90151-6 · Cited by 2,839
Symmetry breaking dynamics of human multilimb coordination.
Kelso, J. A. S., & Jeka, J. J. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.3.645 · Cited by 379
Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition.
Diedrich, F. J., & Warren, W. H. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.183 · Cited by 368
Effects of walking velocity on relative phase dynamics in the trunk in human walking
van Emmerik, R. E. A., & WAGENAAR, R. C. (1996) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)00128-x · Cited by 291
Relative phase quantifies interjoint coordination
Burgess-Limerick, R., Abernethy, B., & Neal, R. J. (1993) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(93)90617-n · Cited by 184
Cited by
Quantifying rearfoot–forefoot coordination in human walking
Chang, R., Van Emmerik, R., & Hamill, J. (2008) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.024 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamill, J., Haddad, J. M., & McDermott, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-418
- ISSN
- 1065-8483 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2688
- OpenAlex
- W1607972421
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Issues in Quantifying Variability from a Dynamical Systems Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1123/jab.16.4.407
- The paper
- Hamill, J., Haddad, J. M., & McDermott, W. J. (2000). Issues in Quantifying Variability from a Dynamical Systems Perspective. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.16.4.407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.