The effects of choice on autonomous motivation, perceived autonomy support, and physical activity levels in high school physical education
Abstract
This study examined whether the provision of choice in physical education (PE) enhanced students’ autonomous motivation, perceived autonomy support, and physical activity (PA) levels, relative to a “regular PE” control group. Students from eight intact high school PE classes (N = 257, Mage = 12.91) were randomly assigned to control (i.e., four classes) and intervention (i.e., four classes) conditions. Students in the intervention group were given a unique opportunity to choose their preferred participatory role in their PE units, while control students participated in normal teacher-led PE, and data were collected over a 15-week program (i.e., three units of five weeks each). The results indicated that a lack of choice in PE aligned with less positive perceptions of autonomy support among students within the control group, compared with their counterparts in the intervention group. In some choice formats, students exhibited significantly higher PA levels than students who undertook normal PE. These findings indicate that offering choice in high school PE lessons may encourage perceptions of autonomy support and levels of in-class physical activity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modified physical education lessons were commonly used as single-component interventions or as part of multicomponent interventions.
“Modified PE lessons were commonly used as single component interventions or as part of multicomponent interventions, and were effective in significantly increasing lesson time PA (Bronikowski & Bronikowska, 2011;Fairclough & Stratton, 2005;How et al., 2013;Martin & Fairclough, 2008).”
From The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as How et al., 2013
Modified physical education lessons were effective in significantly increasing lesson time physical activity.
“Modified PE lessons were commonly used as single component interventions or as part of multicomponent interventions, and were effective in significantly increasing lesson time PA (Bronikowski & Bronikowska, 2011;Fairclough & Stratton, 2005;How et al., 2013;Martin & Fairclough, 2008).”
From The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as How et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- How, Y. M., Whipp, P., Dimmock, J., & Jackson, B.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Education (SG)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Teaching in Physical Education
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-148
- ISSN
- 0273-5024 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2769
- OpenAlex
- W2137215323
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Teaching in Physical Education (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Physical education and sports games research
- Keywords
- student choice, autonomous motivation, perceived autonomy support, physical activity level, high school physical education, teacher-centered instruction, self-determination theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review