The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Look at Posturographic Analysis in the Clinical Context: Sway-Density versus Other Parameterization Techniques
Abstract
In order to identify useful guidelines for the clinical practitioner as regards the use of static posturographic analysis, we collected a set of posrurograms from 3 groups of participants (normal participants. Parkinsonian patients, and osteoporotic patients), according to the Romberg test. From each posturogram, we extracted global parameters (in the time domain and frequency domain) and structural parameters (based on diffusion plots and sway-density plots), with a total of 38 parameters. The discriminative power of each parameter was evaluated by means of statistical analysis in relation to the condition effect (open vs. closed eyes) and the pathology effect (normal participants vs. patients). The initial set of 38 parameters was reduced to 24 by identifying clear redundancies, and then to 18 by eliminating the parameters that did not pass the condition effect with normal participants. These parameters were analyzed for reliability and discriminative power in the general framework of a biomechanic model of postural stabilization. At the end of this analysis, we suggested that a set of 4 parameters is particularly valuable in the clinical practice: 2 global parameters (sway-path and frequency band of the posturogram) and 2 structural parameters (mean value of peaks and mean inter-peak distance in the sway-density plots).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revisão sobre posturografia baseada em plataforma de força para avaliação do equilíbrio
Duarte, M., & Freitas, S. M. S. F. (2010) · Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia · doi:10.1590/s1413-35552010000300003 · Cited by 573
Ruhe, A., Fejer, R., & Walker, B. (2011) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1543-2 · Cited by 382
Clinical stabilometry standardization
Scoppa, F., Capra, R., Gallamini, M., & Shiffer, R. (2013) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.009 · Cited by 329
Dynamical structure of center-of-pressure trajectories in patients recovering from stroke
Roerdink, M., De Haart, M., Daffertshofer, A., Donker, S. F., Geurts, A. C. H., & Beek, P. J. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0441-7 · Cited by 302
Feature selection of stabilometric parameters based on principal component analysis.
Rocchi, L., Chiari, L., & Cappello, A. (2004) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02351013 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Baratto, L., Morasso, P. G., Re, C., & Spada, G.
- Venue
- Motor Control
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 246-270
- ISSN
- 1087-1640 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2696
- OpenAlex
- W101010170
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Look at Posturographic Analysis in the Clinical Context: Sway-Density versus Other Parameterization Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1123/mcj.6.3.246
- The paper
- Baratto, L., Morasso, P. G., Re, C., & Spada, G. (2002). A New Look at Posturographic Analysis in the Clinical Context: Sway-Density versus Other Parameterization Techniques. Motor Control. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.6.3.246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.