A Different World: A BlackCrit Reconceptualization of Historically Black Colleges and Universities Athletics
Abstract
Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have made notable social, cultural, and economic contributions to the African Diaspora, particularly since their inception in the United States. Being that HBCU athletic programs account for a small proportion of the intercollegiate athletic industry, these unique entities are often examined in the same vein as their Historically White Institution counterparts without a full account of the intergenerational adverse impacts of systemic racism. Since HBCUs are situated within the distinct context of Blackness, the researchers offer a reconceptualization through the theoretical lens of Black Critical Theory. This manuscript illuminates linkages across extant literature, while also presenting a budding theoretical framework in the study of sport, and sport organizations, that have deeply embedded relationships with communities, for example, HBCUs and the Black community, stickball and lacrosse within Indigenous communities, and the relationship between women and womens’ sports leagues. Implications of this work are centered on promoting more critical reconceptualizations of sporting spaces that reflect the full diversity of the societies in which they exist.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The market-driven logics of the field often leave smaller institutional types understudied or positioned against HPWIs.
“Aligning with the broader body of sport organization scholarship, the market-driven logics of the field often leave smaller institutional types understudied or positioned against HPWIs (Historically and Predominantly White Institutions) (Foster et al., 2022;Newman 2014).”
From “It’s Not Just About Competition – It’s Ceremony”: Introducing the Embedded Indigeneity Framework for Understanding Identity, Mission, and Practice in TCU and NASNTI Athletics (2026) · cites this paper as Foster et al., 2022
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445 · see citing works
Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism
Kymlicka, W. (2015) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0017-4 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Dancy, T. E., Edwards, K. T., & Earl Davis, J. (2018) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085918754328 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foster, S., & Welch, N. (2026) · Journal of Intercollegiate Sport · doi:10.17161/jis.v19i3.24806
Self-citation
- Authors
- Foster, S. J. L., Singer, J. N., & Cooper, J. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- Venue
- Sociology of Sport Journal
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2023-03-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-50
- ISSN
- 0741-1235 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2785
- OpenAlex
- W4285412646
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology of Sport Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- historically Black colleges and universities, college athletics, Black critical theory, systemic racism, African diaspora, Black communities, lacrosse, indigenous peoples, sport and community
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review