A Survey of U.S. Olympic Coaches: Variables Perceived to Have Influenced Athlete Performances and Coach Effectiveness
Abstract
As part of a larger project to examine variables perceived to influence performance in Olympic competition, this manuscript was designed to (a) report coaches’ perceptions of variables influencing Olympic athlete performance, (b) triangulate findings from surveys and interviews with Olympic athletes, and (c) examine coaches’ perceptions of variables influencing Olympic coaching effectiveness. Surveys were completed by 46 U.S. Atlanta Olympic coaches (46% of all U.S. coaches) and 19 U.S. Nagano coaches (45% of all U.S. coaches). A large number of variables were perceived by coaches to have influenced athlete performances and included having plans for dealing with distractions, strong team chemistry and cohesion, loud and enthusiastic crowd support, high levels of athlete confidence, and fair and effective team selection. Variables perceived to have influenced coaching effectiveness included markedly changed coaching behaviors, the inability to establish trust with athletes, the inability to effectively handle crisis situations, staying cool under pressure, and making fair but decisive decisions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elite-level coaches should also be considered performers in their own right.
“researchers have proposed that elite-level coaches should also be considered as performers in their own right (e.g. competition preparation and psychological state) [5, 6].”
From The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 239
- Authors
- Gould, D., Greenleaf, C., Guinan, D., & Chung, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- University of North Texas (US)
- 3Full Spectrum Consulting
- Venue
- The Sport Psychologist
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-250
- ISSN
- 0888-4781 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2793
- OpenAlex
- W2102664015
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Sport Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
- Keywords
- coaching effectiveness, athletic performance, coach perceptions, team cohesion, team chemistry, crowd support, athlete confidence, team selection, crisis management, coach behavior, Atlanta Olympics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review