Cited by 229Gut microbiota and healthAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Microbiome disturbances and autism spectrum disorders

Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.·2015·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are considered a heterogenous set of neurobehavioral diseases, with the rates of diagnosis dramatically increasing in the past few decades. As genetics alone does not explain the underlying cause in many cases, attention has turned to environmental factors as potential etiological agents. Gastrointestinal disorders are a common comorbidity in ASD patients. It was thus hypothesized that a gut-brain link may account for some autistic cases. With the characterization of the human microbiome, this concept has been expanded to include the microbiota-gut-brain axis. There are mounting reports in animal models and human epidemiologic studies linking disruptive alterations in the gut microbiota or dysbiosis and ASD symptomology. In this review, we will explore the current evidence that gut dysbiosis in animal models and ASD patients correlates with disease risk and severity. The studies to date have surveyed how gut microbiome changes may affect these neurobehavioral disorders. However, we harbor other microbiomes in the body that might impact brain function. We will consider microbial colonies residing in the oral cavity, vagina, and the most recently discovered one in the placenta. Based on the premise that gut microbiota alterations may be causative agents in ASD, several therapeutic options have been tested, such as diet modulations, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, antibiotics, fecal transplantation, and activated charcoal. The potential benefits of these therapies will be considered. Finally, the possible mechanisms by which changes in the gut bacterial communities may result in ASD and related neurobehavioral disorders will be examined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/dmd.115.063826

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 223 · Cited by 229

Authors
Rosenfeld, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
1557-1571
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106798170
Cited by
229
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 6
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, gut microbiota, dysbiosis, microbiota-gut-brain axis, gastrointestinal comorbidities, oral microbiota, vaginal microbiota, placental microbiome, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, antibiotic therapy, activated carbon, neurobehavioral disorders, animal models
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Humans, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract, Prebiotics, Microbiota, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review