Cited by 108Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

Regulation of Inflammatory Pain by Inhibition of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase

Open access
Naidu, Pattipati S., Kinsey, Steven G., Guo, Tai L., Cravatt, Benjamin F., Lichtman, Aron H.·2010·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Although cannabinoids are efficacious in laboratory animal models of inflammatory pain, their established cannabimimetic actions diminish enthusiasm for their therapeutic development. Conversely, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the chief catabolic enzyme regulating the endogenous cannabinoid N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide), has emerged as an attractive target for treating pain and other conditions. Here, we tested WIN 55212-2 [(R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de)-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-napthalenylmethanone], a cannabinoid receptor agonist, and genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of FAAH in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) mouse model of inflammatory pain. WIN 55212-2 significantly reduced edema and hot-plate hyperalgesia caused by LPS infusion into the hind paws, although the mice also displayed analgesia and other central nervous system effects. FAAH(-/-) mice exhibited reduced paw edema and hyperalgesia in this model without apparent cannabimimetic effects. Transgenic mice expressing FAAH exclusively on neurons continued to display the antiedematous, but not the antihyperalgesic, phenotype. The CB(2) cannabinoid receptor (CB(2)) antagonist SR144528 [N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide] blocked this non-neuronal, anti-inflammatory phenotype, and the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)) antagonist rimonabant [SR141716, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide] blocked the antihyperalgesic phenotype. The FAAH inhibitor URB597 [cyclohexylcarbamic acid 3'-carbamoylbiphenyl-3-yl ester] attenuated the development of LPS-induced paw edema and reversed LPS-induced hyperalgesia through the respective CB(2) and CB(1) mechanisms of action. However, the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 antagonist capsazepine did not affect either the antihyperalgesic or antiedematous effects of URB597. Finally, URB597 attenuated levels of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha in LPS-treated paws. These findings demonstrate that simultaneous elevations in non-neuronal and neuronal endocannabinoid signaling are possible through inhibition of a single enzymatic target, thereby offering a potentially powerful strategy for treating chronic inflammatory pain syndromes that operate at multiple levels of anatomical integration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/jpet.109.164806

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 108

Authors
Naidu, P. S., Kinsey, S. G., Guo, T. L., Cravatt, B. F., & Lichtman, A. H.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
334
Issue
1
Pages
182-190
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095267260
Cited by
108
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01DA03672)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA15197, P01DA009789, R01DA015197, P01DA017259, R01DA003672, R01-DA-03672, P50DA005274, T32DA007027)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Keywords
fatty acid amide hydrolase, FAAH inhibition, inflammatory pain, anandamide, endocannabinoid system, WIN 55,212-2, paw edema, CB2 receptor, CB1 receptor, rimonabant, SR144528, URB597
MeSH terms
Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolases, Amidohydrolases, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Disease Models, Animal, Edema, Female, Hyperalgesia, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Pain, Cytokines, Mice, Knockout, Benzoxazines, Mice, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists, Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review