Cited by 452Smoking Behavior and CessationPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Accelerated Metabolism of Nicotine and Cotinine in Pregnant Smokers

Dempsey, Delia, Jacob, Peyton, Benowitz, Neal L.·2002·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is the foremost modifiable risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine is a suspected fetal neuroteratogen. There is concern that nicotine may achieve toxic levels during pregnancy if nicotine replacement therapies are prescribed at doses used in the nonpregnant state. Ten healthy, volunteer, pregnant smokers received infusions of deuterium-labeled nicotine and cotinine during pregnancy and again postpartum. From blood and urine measurements, the following were determined: clearance (renal and nonrenal) of nicotine and cotinine, clearance of nicotine via the cotinine pathway (an indicator of CYP2A6 activity), and daily intake of nicotine from smoking. The clearance of nicotine and cotinine was significantly higher (60 and 140%, respectively), and the half-life of cotinine was much shorter (8.8 versus 16.6 h, P < 0.01) during pregnancy. Although plasma levels of cotinine were lower during pregnancy (119 versus 202 ng/ml, P < 0.05), daily intake of nicotine from smoking was similar during pregnancy and postpartum. For a given level of intake, the pharmacologic and toxicologic effects of nicotine during pregnancy are anticipated to be less than expected from nicotine metabolism data in nonpregnant women. Our data indicate that no downward dose adjustment needs to be made for nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy. Conversely, higher than usual doses of nicotine may be necessary to optimize efficacy. Lower cotinine levels observed during pregnancy do not necessarily reflect less smoke exposure, and cut-off levels used to classify nonsmokers, passive smokers, and active smokers need to be established for pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/jpet.301.2.594

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 452

Authors
Dempsey, D., Jacob, P., & Benowitz, N. L.
Affiliations
San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
301
Issue
2
Pages
594-598
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168788155
Cited by
452
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 30
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da009761-02, 2m01rr000083-41)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA02277, DA 12393, P30DA012393, DA09761)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 00083)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
nicotine metabolism, cotinine, pregnancy, smoking during pregnancy, nicotine replacement therapy, CYP2A6, nicotine clearance, dose adjustment, passive smoking
MeSH terms
Adult, Cotinine, Female, Humans, Kinetics, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Saliva, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review