Hydroxynorketamine Blocks N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Currents by Binding to Closed Receptors
Open accessAbstract
Ketamine, a dissociative anesthetic, is experiencing a clinical resurgence as a fast-acting antidepressant. In the central nervous system, ketamine acts primarily by blocking NMDA receptor currents. Although it is generally safe in a clinical setting, it can be addictive, and several of its derivatives are being investigated as preferable alternatives. 2 R,6 R-Hydroxynorketamine (HNK), a ketamine metabolite, reproduces some of the therapeutic effects of ketamine and appears to lack abuse liability. Here, we report a systematic investigation of the effects of HNK on macroscopic responses elicited from recombinant NMDA receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. We found that, like ketamine, HNK reduced NMDA receptor currents in a dose-, pH-, and voltage-dependent manner. Relative to ketamine, it had 100-fold-lower potency (46 µM at pH 7.2), 10-fold-slower inhibition onset, slower apparent dissociation rate, weaker voltage dependence, and complete competition by magnesium. Notably, HNK inhibition was fully effective when applied to resting receptors. These results revealed unexpected properties of hydroxynorketamine that warrant its further investigation as a possible therapeutic in pathologies associated with NMDA receptor dysfunction. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: NMDA receptors are excitatory ion channels with fundamental roles in synaptic transmission and plasticity, and their dysfunction associates with severe neuropsychiatric disorders. 2 R,6 R-Hydroxynorketamine, a metabolite of ketamine, mimics some of the neuroactive properties of ketamine and may lack its abuse liability. Results show that 2 R,6 R-hydroxynorketamine blocks NMDA receptor currents with low affinity and weak voltage dependence and is effective when applied to resting receptors. These properties highlight its effectiveness to a subset of NMDA receptor responses and recommend it for further investigation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Association and dissociation rate constants for (2R,6R)-HNK were slower relative to ketamine.
“association and dissociation rate constants for (2R,6R)-HNK were slower relative to ketamine.”
From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Abbott & Popescu, 2020
The ‘Inhibitory Effect of HNK on NMDA Receptor Currents’ section explicitly describes both apparent rate constants as slower for HNK than for ketamine. However, Table 2 in the Discussion lists a higher dissociation rate constant for HNK (1.3 s⁻¹) than for ketamine (0.7 s⁻¹), contradicting the paper’s own description of slower dissociation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInhibitory effects of (2R,6R)-HNK at 500 μM at GluN2A-containing NMDARs in HEK-293 cells with glutamate and glycine were enhanced by 84% at pH 6.8 and 87% at pH 7.2.
“the inhibitory effects of (2R,6R)-HNK at a very high and pharmacologically not relevant concentration of 500 μM at GluN2A-containing NMDARs in HEK-293 cells in the presence of glutamate and glycine was enhanced by 84 and 87% at pH 6.8 and 7.2, respectively (Abbott & Popescu, 2020).”
From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Abbott & Popescu, 2020
The ‘Inhibitory Effect of HNK on NMDA Receptor Currents’ section reports 84% and 87% inhibition at pH 6.8 and 7.2, respectively, in GluN1/GluN2A-expressing HEK-293 cells exposed to glutamate and glycine. Those are inhibition levels, not increases of 84% and 87%. Our copy also renders the HNK dose as ‘500 mM,’ so it does not verify the claimed 500 μM dose. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhen (2R,6R)-HNK was applied before glutamate, its inhibitory effects on whole-cell NMDAR currents increased relative to co-application, suggesting preferential binding to inactive receptors.
“when (2R,6R)-HNK was applied prior to glutamate, the inhibitory effects on whole-cell NMDAR currents were increased relative to when it was co-applied with glutamate which suggests (2R,6R)-HNK preferentially binds inactive receptors.”
From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Abbott & Popescu, 2020
Inhibitory effects of (2R,6R)-HNK at 500 μM were enhanced at negative holding potentials, like ketamine and Mg2+.
“the inhibitory effects of (2R,6R)-HNK (500 μM) were enhanced at negative holding potentials, much like ketamine and Mg2+.”
From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Abbott & Popescu, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms
Zanos, P., Moaddel, R., Morris, P. J., Riggs, L. M., Highland, J. N., Georgiou, P., Pereira, E. F. R., Albuquerque, E. X., Thomas, C. J., Zarate, C. A., et al. (2018) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.117.015198 · Cited by 1,260 · see citing works
Huettner, J. E., & Bean, B. P. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.4.1307 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Effects of chronic ketamine use on frontal and medial temporal cognition
Chan, K. W. S., Lee, T. M. C., Siu, A. M. H., Wong, D. P. L., Kam, C.-M., Tsang, S. K. M., & Chan, C. C. H. (2013) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.014 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Featherstone RE, Liang Y, Saunders J, Tatard-Leitman V, Ehrlichman RS, and Siegel SJ (2012) Subchronic ketamine treatment leads to permanent changes in EEG, cognition and the astrocytic glutamate transporter EAAT2 in mice. Neu- robiol Dis 47:338-346.
- Liu H T, Hollmann M W, Liu W H, Hoenemann C W, and Durieux M E (2001) Modulation of NMDA receptor function by ketamine and magnesium: Part I. Anesth Analg 92 (5):1173-1181, doi: 10.1097/00000539-200105000-00019 11323343. · DOI
- Mazzeffi M, Johnson K, and Paciullo C (2015) Ketamine in adult cardiac surgery and the cardiac surgery Intensive Care Unit: an evidence-based clinical review. Ann Card Anaesth 18:202-209.
- Morris M E (1992) Brain and CSF magnesium concentrations during magnesium deficit in animals and humans: neurological symptoms. Magnes Res 5 (4):303-313 1296767.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants
Hess, E. M., Riggs, L. M., Michaelides, M., & Gould, T. D. (2022) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114892 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Hydroxynorketamines: Pharmacology and Potential Therapeutic Applications
Highland, J. N., Zanos, P., Riggs, L. M., Georgiou, P., Clark, S. M., Morris, P. J., Moaddel, R., Thomas, C. J., Zarate, C. A., Pereira, E. F. R., et al. (2021) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pharmrev.120.000149 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Bridging Rapid and Sustained Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine
Kim, J.-W., Suzuki, K., Kavalali, E. T., & Monteggia, L. M. (2023) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2023.02.003 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Real-world study of intranasal ketamine for use in patients with refractory chronic migraine
Yuan, H., Natekar, A., Park, J. S., Lauritsen, C., Viscusi, E. R., & Marmura, M. J. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.11.20.22282558 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abbott, J. A., & Popescu, G. K.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-210
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7406986
- OpenAlex
- W3039531169
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM099607)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS098385, R01NS097016, R01NS108750, R35NS132248)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- hydroxynorketamine, ketamine metabolites, NMDA receptor, receptor antagonism, rapid-acting antidepressants, dissociative anesthetics, abuse liability, voltage dependence, dissociation kinetics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Cyclohexanes, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Ketamine, Synaptic Transmission, Recombinant Proteins, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review