Cited by 215Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Four Pharmacologically Distinct Subtypes of α4β2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Expressed in Xenopus laevisOocytes

Zwart, Ruud, Vijverberg, Henk P.M.·1998·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

Nicotinic receptors generally are presumed to consist of two alpha and three non-alpha subunits. We varied the relative levels of expression of the neuronal nicotinic alpha4 and beta2 receptor subunits in Xenopus laevis oocytes by nuclear injection of cDNAs coding for these subunits in alpha:beta ratios of 9:1, 1:1, and 1:9. The sensitivities of the receptors to acetylcholine and d-tubocurarine were investigated in voltage-clamp experiments. For receptors expressed at the 9:1 and 1:1 alpha:beta ratios, the EC50 value of acetylcholine is approximately 60 microM. For the majority of the receptors expressed at the 1:9 alpha:beta ratio, the sensitivity to acetylcholine is enhanced 30-fold. No evidence for more than one type of acetylcholine binding site in a single receptor is obtained. The sensitivity to d-tubocurarine decreases with decreasing alpha:beta ratio. IC50 values of d-tubocurarine are 0.2, 0.5, and 2 microM for the 9:1, 1:1, and 1:9 alpha:beta ratios, respectively. At the 1:9 alpha:beta ratio, additional receptors with an IC50 value of 163 microM d-tubocurarine are expressed. At least two components with distinct sensitivities to d-tubocurarine are required to account for the shift in IC50. The combined agonist and antagonist effects reveal four distinct subtypes of alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptors. The results imply that the subunit stoichiometry of heteromeric alpha4beta2 acetylcholine receptors is not restricted to 2alpha:3beta.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/mol.54.6.1124

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 215

Authors
Zwart, R., & Vijverberg, H. P. M.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
1124-1131
ISSN
0026-895X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148168931
Cited by
215
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, alpha4beta2 receptor, receptor subunit stoichiometry, acetylcholine sensitivity, acetylcholine binding site, receptor subtypes, Xenopus oocytes
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Oocytes, Plasmids, Receptors, Nicotinic, Structure-Activity Relationship, Tubocurarine, Xenopus laevis, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Nicotinic Antagonists, Protein Isoforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review