Cited by 233Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsTreatment of Major Depression

Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Long-Term Depression: Molecular Mechanisms

Open access
Gladding, Clare M., Fitzjohn, Stephen M., Molnár, Elek·2009·Pharmacological Reviews

Abstract

The ability to modify synaptic transmission between neurons is a fundamental process of the nervous system that is involved in development, learning, and disease. Thus, synaptic plasticity is the ability to bidirectionally modify transmission, where long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTD) represent the best characterized forms of plasticity. In the hippocampus, two main forms of LTD coexist that are mediated by activation of either N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptors (NMDARs) or metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Compared with NMDAR-LTD, mGluR-LTD is less well understood, but recent advances have started to delineate the underlying mechanisms. mGluR-LTD at CA3:CA1 synapses in the hippocampus can be induced either by synaptic stimulation or by bath application of the group I selective agonist (R,S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine. Multiple signaling mechanisms have been implicated in mGluR-LTD, illustrating the complexity of this form of plasticity. This review provides an overview of recent studies investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying hippocampal mGluR-LTD. It highlights the role of key molecular components and signaling pathways that are involved in the induction and expression of mGluR-LTD and considers how the different signaling pathways may work together to elicit a persistent reduction in synaptic transmission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/pr.109.001735

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LTD mediated through metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) has emerged as a major alternative to NMDAR-mediated LTD in widespread areas of the brain.

    “Notably, LTD mediated through metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) has emerged as a major alterative to NMDAR-mediated LTD in widespread areas of the brain124, 125, 126”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 222 · Cited by 233

Authors
Gladding, C. M., Fitzjohn, S. M., & Molnár, E.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
395-412
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169371082
Cited by
233
References
222
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F011326/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
metabotropic glutamate receptors, long-term depression, synaptic plasticity, hippocampus, DOPA, signaling pathways, CA3-CA1 synapses, synaptic transmission
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neurons, Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Long-Term Synaptic Depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review