CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Advanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

Computational multiheterodyne spectroscopy

Open access
Burghoff, David, Yang, Yang, Hu, Qing·2016·Science Advances
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1601227PMC PMC5106200
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A computationally enabled approach is used to perform dual-comb spectroscopy without a phase reference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.1601227

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recording n∆f_r signal can improve the jitter tracking speed, as reported in dual-comb spectroscopy.

    “Recording 𝑛∆𝑓 r signal can improve the speed, as reported in dual-comb spectroscopy [38,39].”

    From Jitter correction for asynchronous optical sampling terahertz spectroscopy using free-running pulsed lasers (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results section describes continuously updating estimates of the offset and repetition rates, making the method amenable to real-time processing. The Results and Phase and timing correction sections also model comb-line signals with an n-dependent phase, but neither says that recording an nΔfᵣ signal improves jitter-tracking speed. Searches for higher-harmonic recording and faster tracking found no such comparison in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.71)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Udem T., Holzwarth R., Hänsch T. W., Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233– 237 (2002). 11894107
  2. [2]van der Weide D. W., Keilmann F., Picosecond dual-source interferometer extending Fourier-transform spectrometer to microwave regime. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig. 3, 1731– 1734 (1996).
  3. [3]D. W. van der Weide, F. Keilmann, U.S. Patent 5,748,309 (1998).
  4. [4]van der Weide D. W., Murakowski J., Keilmann F., Gas-absorption spectroscopy with electronic terahertz techniques. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 48, 740– 743 (2000).
  5. [5]Schiller S., Spectrometry with frequency combs. Opt. Lett. 27, 766– 768 (2002). 18007926
  6. [6]Diddams S. A., Hollberg L., Mbele V., Molecular fingerprinting with the resolved modes of a femtosecond laser frequency comb. Nature 445, 627– 630 (2007). 17287805
  7. [7]Coddington I., Swann W. C., Newbury N. R., Coherent multiheterodyne spectroscopy using stabilized optical frequency combs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013902 (2008). 18232764
  8. [10]Holzwarth R., Holzwarth R., Udem T., Hänsch T. W., Knight J. C., Wadsworth W. J., Russell P. S. J., Optical frequency synthesizer for precision spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2264– 2267 (2000). 10977987
  9. [11]Roy J., Deschênes J.-D., Potvin S., Genest J., Continuous real-time correction and averaging for frequency comb interferometry. Opt. Express 20, 21932– 21939 (2012). 23037343
  10. [12]Ideguchi T., Poisson A., Guelachvili G., Picqué N., Hänsch T. W., Adaptive real-time dual-comb spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 5, 3375 (2014). 24572636 PMC3948060
  11. [13]Deschênes J.-D., Giaccarri P., Genest J., Optical referencing technique with CW lasers as intermediate oscillators for continuous full delay range frequency comb interferometry. Opt. Express 18, 23358– 23370 (2010). 21164677
  12. [14]Giaccari P., Deschênes J.-D., Saucier P., Genest J., Tremblay P., Active Fourier transform spectroscopy combining the direct RF beating of two fiber-based mode-locked lasers with a novel referencing method. Opt. Express 16, 4347– 4365 (2008). 18542532
  13. [15]Del’Haye P., Schliesser A., Arcizet O., Wilken T., Holzwarth R., Kippenberg T. J., Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator. Nature 450, 1214– 1217 (2007). 18097405
  14. [16]Kippenberg T. J., Holzwarth R., Diddams S. A., Microresonator-based optical frequency combs. Science 332, 555– 559 (2011). 21527707
  15. [17]Hugi A., Villares G., Blaser S., Liu H. C., Faist J., Mid-infrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade laser. Nature 492, 229– 233 (2012). 23235876
  16. [18]Lu Q. Y., Razeghi M., Slivken S., Bandyopadhyay N., Bai Y., Zhou W. J., Chen M., Heydari D., Haddadi A., McClintock R., Amanti M., Sirtori C., High power frequency comb based on mid-infrared quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 051105 (2015).
  17. [20]Wienold M., Röben B., Schrottke L., Grahn H. T., Evidence for frequency comb emission from a Fabry-Pérot terahertz quantum-cascade laser. Opt. Express 22, 30410– 30424 (2014). 25606987
  18. [22]Wang Y., Soskind M. G., Wang W., Wysocki G., High-resolution multi-heterodyne spectroscopy based on Fabry-Perot quantum cascade lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 031114 (2014).
  19. [23]Villares G., Hugi A., Blaser S., Faist J., Dual-comb spectroscopy based on quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Nat. Commun. 5, 5192 (2014). 25307936
  20. [25]Suh M.-G., Yang Q.-F., Yang K. Y., Yi X., Vahala K., Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy. Optics (2016); http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08222. 27738017 · arXiv
  21. [29]Villares G., Wolf J., Kazakov D., Süess M. J., Hugi A., Beck M., Faist J., On-chip dual-comb based on quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 251104 (2015).
  22. [30]Burghoff D., Yang Y., Hayton D. J., Gao J.-R., Reno J. L., Hu Q., Evaluating the coherence and time-domain profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Opt. Express 23, 1190– 1202 (2015). 25835878
  23. [34]Newbury N. R., Coddington I., Swann W., Sensitivity of coherent dual-comb spectroscopy. Opt. Express 18, 7929– 7945 (2010). 20588636
  24. [35]Wan E. A., Van Der Merwe R., The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. Adapt. Syst. Signal Process. Commun. Control Symp. 2000. AS-SPCC. IEEE 2000 153– 158 (2002).
  25. [36]Christiansen G. S., Modeling of PRML timing loop as a Kalman filter. 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Commun. Glob. Bridg. 2, 1157– 1161 (1994).
  26. [37]Arulampalam M. S., Maskell S., Gordon N., Clapp T., A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50, 174– 188 (2002).
  27. [39]Poore A. B., Slocumb B. J., Suchomel B. J., Obermeyer F. H., Herman S. M., Gadaleta S. M., Batch maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation with process noise for tracking applications. Proc. SPIE 5204, 188– 199 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burghoff, D., Yang, Y., & Hu, Q.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Burghoff, David
  • Yang, Yang
ORCID
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2016-11-04
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
e1601227-e1601227
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.1601227
PMC
PMC5106200
OpenAlex
W2417056832
Cited by
114
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Defense Sciences Office, DARPA (ID0EB1AG11603, W31P4Q- 16-1-0001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
dual-comb spectroscopy, frequency combs, phase noise, coherent integration, phase reference, high-resolution spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review