Cited by 48Ultrasound Imaging and ElastographyAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Imaging localized neuronal activity at fast time scales through biomechanics

Open access
Patz, Samuel, Fovargue, Daniel, Schregel, Katharina, Nazari, Navid, Palotai, Miklos, Barbone, Paul E., Fabry, Ben, Hammers, Alexander +4 more·2019·Science Advances

Abstract

Noninvasive measurement of fast neuronal activity, based on tissue stiffness maps from MRI elastography, is presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aav3816

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preclinical work suggests that some biomechanical changes occur faster than BOLD responses, in a similar way to DfMRI.

    “Preclinical work suggests that some biomechanical changes occur faster than BOLD responses, in a similar way to DfMRI (Nunes et al., 2021; Patz et al., 2019; Tsurugizawa et al., 2013).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Patz et al., 2019

    The Results and Discussion report stiffness changes at stimulus-switching frequencies where the slower BOLD response cannot follow, supporting the claim about faster biomechanical changes. The passages do not compare those changes with DfMRI, so that part is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Ogawa S., Lee T. M., Kay A. R., Tank D. W., Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 9868– 9872 (1990). 2124706 PMC55275
  2. [2]Belliveau J. W., Kennedy D. N. Jr., McKinstry R. C., Buchbinder B. R., Weisskoff R. M., Cohen M. S., Vevea J. M., Brady T. J., Rosen B. R., Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science 254, 716– 719 (1991). 1948051
  3. [3]Tian P., Teng I. C., May L. D., Kurz R., Lu K., Scadeng M., Hillman E. M. C., De Crespigny A. J., D’Arceuil H. E., Mandeville J. B., Marota J. J. A., Rosen B. R., Liu T. T., Boas D. A., Buxton R. B., Dale A. M., Devor A., Cortical depth-specific microvascular dilation underlies laminar differences in blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 15246– 15251 (2010). 20696904 PMC2930564
  4. [5]Lewis L. D., Setsompop K., Rosen B. R., Polimeni J. R., Fast fMRI can detect oscillatory neural activity in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E6679– E6685 (2016). 27729529 PMC5087037
  5. [6]Mace E., Montaldo G., Cohen I., Baulac M., Fink M., Tanter M., Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain. Nat. Methods 8, 662– 664 (2011). 21725300
  6. [7]Hill D. K., The volume change resulting from stimulation of a giant nerve fibre. J. Physiol. 111, 304– 327 (1950). 14795441 PMC1392827
  7. [8]Iwasa K., Tasaki I., Gibbons R. C., Swelling of nerve fibers associated with action potentials. Science 210, 338– 339 (1980). 7423196
  8. [9]Fields R. D., Signaling by neuronal swelling. Sci. Sig. 4, tr1 (2011). PMC3201844 21224445
  9. [10]Korkotian E., Segal M., Spike-associated fast contraction of dendritic spines in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuron 30, 751– 758 (2001). 11430808
  10. [11]Muthupillai R., Ehman R. L., Magnetic resonance elastography. Nat. Med. 2, 601– 603 (1996). 8616724
  11. [12]Fovargue D., Kozerke S., Sinkus R., Nordsletten D., Robust MR elastography stiffness quantification using a localized divergence free finite element reconstruction. Med. Image Anal. 44, 126– 142 (2018). 29247876
  12. [13]Sinkus R., Lorenzen J., Schrader D., Lorenzen M., Dargatz M., Holz D., High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection. Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 1649– 1664 (2000). 10870716
  13. [14]Schregel K., Nazari N., Nowicki M. O., Palotai M., Lawler S. E., Sinkus R., Barbone P. E., Patz S., Characterization of glioblastoma in an orthotopic mouse model with magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 31, e3840 (2018). 29193449 PMC6538416
  14. [15]Schregel K., Wuerfel E., Garteiser P., Gemeinhardt I., Prozorovski T., Aktas O., Merz H., Petersen D., Wuerfel J., Sinkus R., Demyelination reduces brain parenchymal stiffness quantified in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 6650– 6655 (2012). 22492966 PMC3340071
  15. [17]Fovargue D., Nordsletten D., Sinkus R., Stiffness reconstruction methods for MR elastography. NMR Biomed. 31, e3935 (2018). 29774974 PMC6175248
  16. [18]Bosshard S. C., Baltes C., Wyss M. T., Mueggler T., Weber B., Rudin M., Assessment of brain responses to innocuous and noxious electrical forepaw stimulation in mice using BOLD fMRI. Pain 151, 655– 663 (2010). 20851520
  17. [19]Thompson S. J., Bushnell M. C., Rodent functional and anatomical imaging of pain. Neurosci. Lett. 520, 131– 139 (2012). 22445887
  18. [20]Johnson G. A., Badea A., Brandenburg J., Cofer G., Fubara B., Liu S., Nissanov J., Waxholm space: An image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research. Neuroimage 53, 365– 372 (2010). 20600960 PMC2930145
  19. [21]Gemes G., Koopmeiners A., Rigaud M., Lirk P., Sapunar D., Bangaru M. L., Vilceanu D., Garrison S. R., Ljubkovic M., Mueller S. J., Stucky C. L., Hogan Q. H., Failure of action potential propagation in sensory neurons: Mechanisms and loss of afferent filtering in C-type units after painful nerve injury. J. Physiol. 591, 1111– 1131 (2013). 23148321 PMC3591718
  20. [22]Waddell P. J., Lawson S. N., Electrophysiological properties of subpopulations of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro. Neuroscience 36, 811– 822 (1990). 2234413
  21. [23]Cohen-Kashi-Malina K., Jubran M., Katz Y., Lampl I., Imbalance between excitation and inhibition in the somatosensory cortex produces postadaptation facilitation. J. Neurosci. 33, 8463– 8471 (2013). 23658183 PMC6619615
  22. [24]Bowden D. M., Allan Johnson G., Zaborsky L., Green W. D. K., Moore E., Badea A., Dubach M. F., Bookstein F. L., A symmetrical Waxholm canonical mouse brain for NeuroMaps. J. Neurosci. Methods 195, 170– 175 (2011). 21163300 PMC3103134
  23. [25]G. Paxinos, K. B. J. Franklin, The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Elsevier Academic Press, ed. 2, 2004).
  24. [26]J. de Arcos, D. Fovargue, K. Schregel, R. Neji, S. Patz, R. Sinkus, Imaging primary neuronal activity in the human optical cortex at 1.35Hz, in International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Annual Meeting, Paris, 2018), pp. 147.
  25. [27]Fabry B., Maksym G. N., Butler J. P., Glogauer M., Navajas D., Fredberg J. J., Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 148102 (2001). 11580676
  26. [28]Biot M. A., Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. I. Low-frequency range. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 168 (1956).
  27. [29]Gardel M. L., Kasza K. E., Brangwynne C. P., Liu J., Weitz D. A., Chapter 19: Mechanical response of cytoskeletal networks. Methods Cell Biol. 89, 487– 519 (2008). 19118688 PMC4456006
  28. [30]Tyler W. J., The mechanobiology of brain function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 867– 878 (2012). 23165263
  29. [31]Wang N., Naruse K., Stamenovic D., Fredberg J. J., Mijailovich S. M., Marija Tolic-Nørrelykke I., Polte T., Mannix R., Ingber D. E., Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 7765– 7770 (2001). 11438729 PMC35416
  30. [32]Benfenati V., Ferroni S., Water transport between CNS compartments: functional and molecular interactions between aquaporins and ion channels. Neuroscience 168, 926– 940 (2010). 20026249
  31. [33]Larsen B. R., MacAulay N., Activity-dependent astrocyte swelling is mediated by pH-regulating mechanisms. Glia 65, 1668– 1681 (2017). 28744903
  32. [34]Guo M., Pegoraro A. F., Mao A., Zhou E. H., Arany P. R., Han Y., Burnette D. T., Jensen M. H., Kasza K. E., Moore J. R., Mackintosh F. C., Fredberg J. J., Mooney D. J., Lippincott-Schwartz J., Weitz D. A., Cell volume change through water efflux impacts cell stiffness and stem cell fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E8618– E8627 (2017). 28973866 PMC5642688
  33. [35]Rosenmund C., Westbrook G. L., Calcium-induced actin depolymerization reduces NMDA channel activity. Neuron 10, 805– 814 (1993). 7684233
  34. [36]Gennisson J. L., Grenier N., Combe C., Tanter M., Supersonic shear wave elastography of in vivo pig kidney: Influence of blood pressure, urinary pressure and tissue anisotropy. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 38, 1559– 1567 (2012). 22698515
  35. [37]Tong J., Briggs M. M., McIntosh T. J., Water permeability of aquaporin-4 channel depends on bilayer composition, thickness, and elasticity. Biophys. J. 103, 1899– 1908 (2012). 23199918 PMC3491688
  36. [38]Guenthner C., Runge J. H., Sinkus R., Kozerke S., Analysis and improvement of motion encoding in magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 31, e3908 (2018). 29601114 PMC6585970
  37. [39]Liu Z. M., Schmidt K. F., Sicard K. M., Duong T. Q., Imaging oxygen consumption in forepaw somatosensory stimulation in rats under isoflurane anesthesia. Magn. Reson. Med. 52, 277– 285 (2004). 15282809 PMC2962950

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patz, S., Fovargue, D., Schregel, K., Nazari, N., Palotai, M., Barbone, P. E., Fabry, B., Hammers, A., Holm, S., Kozerke, S., Nordsletten, D., & Sinkus, R.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Patz, Samuel
  • Sinkus, Ralph
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
eaav3816-eaav3816
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2938713030
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R21EB030757)
  • Wellcome Trust (WT 203148/Z/16/Z)
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Boston University
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (668039)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/20072013)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHR 1542/1-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
brain biomechanics, magnetic resonance elastography, brain stiffness, electrical stimulation, thalamus, stimulus frequency dependence
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Forelimb, Hindlimb, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Thalamus, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review