Cited by 105Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Unraveling why we sleep: quantitative analysis reveals abrupt transition from neural reorganization to repair in early development

Open access
Cao, Junyu, Herman, Alexander B., West, Geoffrey B., Poe, Gina, Savage, Van M.·2020·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Discovery of how sleep function shifts from neural reorganization to repair by combining mathematical theory and data analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aba0398

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall evidence indicates that sleep can be broken into two parts: during dreamless sleep metabolic clearance and cellular repair likely occur, and some unknown contribution to improvements in performance and learning on tasks occurs during dreaming.

    “The overall evidence indicates that sleep can be broken into two parts: during dreamless sleep metabolic clearance and cellular it is likely that repair occurs, and some form of unknown contribution to improvements in performance and learning on tasks occurs during dreaming.34”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 105 · Cited by 105

Authors
Cao, J., Herman, A. B., West, G. B., Poe, G., & Savage, V. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Savage, Van M.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2020-09-18
Volume
6
Issue
38
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087503637
Cited by
105
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Science Foundation (PHY1838420)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
sleep function, brain reorganization, neural repair, REM sleep, NREM sleep, neuroplasticity, sleep and learning, developmental transitions, sleep evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review