Cited by 38Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Esophageal extracellular matrix hydrogel mitigates metaplastic change in a dog model of Barrett’s esophagus

Open access
Naranjo, Juan Diego, Saldin, Lindsey T., Sobieski, Eric, Quijano, Lina M., Hill, Ryan C., Chan, Patrick G., Torres, Crisanto, Dziki, Jenna L. +12 more·2020·Science Advances

Abstract

Oral delivery of esophageal extracellular matrix hydrogel mitigates mucosal inflammation and metaplasia in a dog model of reflux.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aba4526

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Esophageal matrix hydrogel shows a tissue-specific remodeling response in an esophageal cancer dog model, as opposed to a urinary bladder matrix hydrogel.

    “while esophageal matrix hydrogel has shown tissue-specific remodeling response in a esophageal cancer dog model, as opposed to an urinary bladder matrix hydrogel [154].”

    From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Results section ('eECM hydrogel mitigates metaplastic change in the esophageal mucosa'; page unavailable) reports improvement in dogs with Barrett’s-type metaplasia after esophageal ECM hydrogel treatment. The study did not use an esophageal cancer model or compare the hydrogel with urinary bladder matrix hydrogel: its control dogs received omeprazole only, as stated in the Results section on macroscopic inflammation (page unavailable). Thus it does not establish the claimed tissue-specific response relative to urinary bladder matrix. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ECM degradation peptides promote M2-like phenotypes in vitro and in vivo.

    “promotion of M2-like phenotypes in vitro [40,44,153] and in vivo [152,154,155].”

    From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says ECM degradation products promote a shift from proinflammatory macrophages toward a regulatory, anti-inflammatory phenotype in vitro and in vivo. The dog study found fewer TNFα-positive cells after eECM hydrogel treatment, but it did not isolate degradation peptides or establish an M2-like phenotype specifically. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. [1]Bissell M. J., Hall H. G., Parry G., How does the extracellular matrix direct gene expression? J. Theor. Biol. 99, 31– 68 (1982). 6892044
  2. [2]Schultz G. S., Davidson J. M., Kirsner R. S., Bornstein P., Herman I. M., Dynamic reciprocity in the wound microenvironment. Wound Repair Regen. 19, 134– 148 (2011). 21362080 PMC3051353
  3. [3]Sellaro T. L., Ranade A., Faulk D. M., McCabe G. P., Dorko K., Badylak S. F., Strom S. C., Maintenance of human hepatocyte function in vitro by liver-derived extracellular matrix gels. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 1075– 1082 (2010). 19845461 PMC2863084
  4. [4]Zhang Y., He Y., Bharadwaj S., Hammam N., Carnagey K., Myers R., Atala A., Van Dyke M., Tissue-specific extracellular matrix coatings for the promotion of cell proliferation and maintenance of cell phenotype. Biomaterials 30, 4021– 4028 (2009). 19410290 PMC8404219
  5. [5]Keane T. J., DeWard A., Londono R., Saldin L. T., Castleton A. A., Carey L., Nieponice A., Lagasse E., Badylak S. F., Tissue-specific effects of esophageal extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. Part A 21, 2293– 2300 (2015). 26192009 PMC4556088
  6. [6]Beattie A. J., Gilbert T. W., Guyot J. P., Yates A. J., Badylak S. F., Chemoattraction of progenitor cells by remodeling extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A 15, 1119– 1125 (2009). 18837648 PMC2789572
  7. [7]Soto A. M., Sonnenschein C., The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory. Bioessays 33, 332– 340 (2011). 21503935 PMC3933226
  8. [8]Bonnans C., Chou J., Werb Z., Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 786– 801 (2014). 25415508 PMC4316204
  9. [9]Joyce J. A., Therapeutic targeting of the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 7, 513– 520 (2005). 15950901
  10. [10]Tomko L. A., Hill R. C., Barrett A., Szulczewski J. M., Conklin M. W., Eliceiri K. W., Keely P. J., Hansen K. C., Ponik S. M., Targeted matrisome analysis identifies thrombospondin-2 and tenascin-C in aligned collagen stroma from invasive breast carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 8, 12941 (2018). 30154546 PMC6113240
  11. [11]Fischer H., Stenling R., Rubio C., Lindblom A., Colorectal carcinogenesis is associated with stromal expression of COL11A1 and COL5A2. Carcinogenesis 22, 875– 878 (2001). 11375892
  12. [12]Wang D., Dubois R. N., The role of COX-2 in intestinal inflammation and colorectal cancer. Oncogene 29, 781– 788 (2010). 19946329 PMC3181054
  13. [13]Fleszar A. J., Walker A., Porubsky V., Flanigan W., James D., Campagnola P. J., Weisman P. S., Kreeger P. K., The extracellular matrix of ovarian cortical inclusion cysts modulates invasion of fallopian tube epithelial cells. APL Bioeng. 2, 031902 (2018). 30556046 PMC6294138
  14. [14]Bissell M. J., Radisky D. C., Rizki A., Weaver V. M., Petersen O. W., The organizing principle: Microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation 70, 537– 546 (2002). 12492495 PMC2933198
  15. [15]Luo M.-L., Zhou Z., Sun L., Yu L., Sun L., Liu J., Yang Z., Ran Y., Yao Y., Hu H., An ADAM12 and FAK positive feedback loop amplifies the interaction signal of tumor cells with extracellular matrix to promote esophageal cancer metastasis. Cancer Lett. 422, 118– 128 (2018). 29476791
  16. [16]Groblewska M., Siewko M., Mroczko B., Szmitkowski M., The role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors (TIMPs) in the development of esophageal cancer. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 50, 12– 19 (2012). 22532131
  17. [17]Bobryshev Y. V., Killingsworth M. C., Lord R. V., Structural alterations of the mucosa stroma in the Barrett's esophagus metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 27, 1498– 1504 (2012). 22591183
  18. [18]Spechler S. J., Souza R. F., Barrett’s esophagus. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 836– 845 (2014). 25162890
  19. [19]Wang K. K., Sampliner R. E.; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology, Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 103, 788– 797 (2008). 18341497
  20. [20]Hvid-Jensen F., Pedersen L., Drewes A. M., Sørensen H. T., Funch-Jensen P., Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1375– 1383 (2011). 21995385
  21. [21]Sikkema M., de Jonge P. J., Steyerberg E. W., Kuipers E. J., Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 235– 244 (2010). 19850156
  22. [22]Saldin L. T., Patel S., Zhang L., Huleihel L., Hussey G. S., Nascari D. G., Quijano L. M., Li X., Raghu D., Bajwa A. K., Smith N. G., Chung C. C., Omstead A. N., Kosovec J. E., Jobe B. A., Turner N. J., Zaidi A. H., Badylak S. F., Extracellular matrix degradation products downregulate neoplastic esophageal cell phenotype. Tissue Eng. Part A 25, 487– 498 (2019). 30259795 PMC6450457
  23. [23]Gillen P., Keeling P., Byrne P. J., West A. B., Hennessy T. P., Experimental columnar metaplasia in the canine oesophagus. Br. J. Surg. 75, 113– 115 (1988). 3349294
  24. [24]Li H., Walsh T. N., O'Dowd G., Gillen P., Byrne P. J., Hennessy T. P., Mechanisms of columnar metaplasia and squamous regeneration in experimental Barrett's esophagus. Surgery 115, 176– 181 (1994). 8310406
  25. [25]Sommer G., Schriefl A., Zeindlinger G., Katzensteiner A., Ainodhofer H., Saxena A., Holzapfel G. A., Multiaxial mechanical response and constitutive modeling of esophageal tissues: Impact on esophageal tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 9, 9379– 9391 (2013). 23933485
  26. [26]Freytes D. O., Martin J., Velankar S. S., Lee A. S., Badylak S. F., Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. Biomaterials 29, 1630– 1637 (2008). 18201760
  27. [27]Makó A., Csóka G., Pásztor E., Marton S., Horvai G., Klebovich I., Formulation of thermoresponsive and bioadhesive gel for treatment of oesophageal pain and inflammation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 72, 260– 265 (2009). 19038337
  28. [28]Hill R. C., Calle E. A., Dzieciatkowska M., Niklason L. E., Hansen K. C., Quantification of extracellular matrix proteins from a rat lung scaffold to provide a molecular readout for tissue engineering. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 961– 973 (2015). 25660013 PMC4390273
  29. [29]Keane T. J., Londono R., Carey R. M., Carruthers C. A., Reing J. E., Dearth C. L., D'Amore A., Medberry C. J., Badylak S. F., Preparation and characterization of a biologic scaffold from esophageal mucosa. Biomaterials 34, 6729– 6737 (2013). 23777917 PMC3727430
  30. [30]Jones J. C. R., Lane K., Hopkinson S. B., Lecuona E., Geiger R. C., Dean D. A., Correa-Meyer E., Gonzales M., Campbell K., Sznajder J. I., Budinger S., Laminin-6 assembles into multimolecular fibrillar complexes with perlecan and participates in mechanical-signal transduction via a dystroglycan-dependent, integrin-independent mechanism. J. Cell Sci. 118, 2557– 2566 (2005). 15928048 PMC2820238
  31. [31]Hirosaki T., Tsubota Y., Kariya Y., Moriyama K., Mizushima H., Miyazaki K., Laminin-6 is activated by proteolytic processing and regulates cellular adhesion and migration differently from laminin-5. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 49287– 49295 (2002). 12379663
  32. [32]Hussey G. S., Keane T. J., Badylak S. F., The extracellular matrix of the gastrointestinal tract: A regenerative medicine platform. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 540– 552 (2017). 28698662
  33. [33]Rieder F., Biancani P., Harnett K., Yerian L., Falk G. W., Inflammatory mediators in gastroesophageal reflux disease: Impact on esophageal motility, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 298, G571– G581 (2010). 20299604 PMC2867418
  34. [34]Langner C., Wolf E.-M., Plieschnegger W., Geppert M., Wigginghaus B., Höss G. M., Eherer A., Schneider N. I., Rehak P., Vieth M., Multilayered epithelium at the gastroesophageal junction is a marker of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Data from a prospective Central European multicenter study (histoGERD trial). Virchows Arch. 464, 409– 417 (2014). 24535701
  35. [35]Flood-Page P., Menzies-Gow A., Phipps S., Ying S., Wangoo A., Ludwig M. S., Barnes N., Robinson D., Kay A. B., Anti-IL-5 treatment reduces deposition of ECM proteins in thebronchial subepithelial basement membrane of mild atopic asthmatics. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1029– 1036 (2003). 14523040 PMC198522
  36. [36]Xu R., Boudreau A., Bissell M. J., Tissue architecture and function: Dynamic reciprocity via extra- and intra-cellular matrices. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28, 167– 176 (2009). 19160017 PMC2720096
  37. [37]de Vega S., Iwamoto T., Yamada Y., Fibulins: Multiple roles in matrix structures and tissue functions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 1890– 1902 (2009). 19189051 PMC11115505
  38. [38]Rasmussen L. H., Jensen L. T., Avnstorp C., Karlsmark T., Peters K., Hørslev-Petersen K., Collagen types I and III propeptides as markers of healing in chronic leg ulcers. A noninvasive method for the determination of procollagen propeptides in wound fluid—Influence of growth hormone. Ann. Surg. 216, 684– 691 (1992). 1466622 PMC1242716
  39. [39]Kratochwil K., Organ specificity in mesenchymal induction demonstrated in the embryonic development of the mammary gland of the mouse. Dev. Biol. 20, 46– 71 (1969). 5795848
  40. [40]Hurst R. E., Kyker K. D., Bonner R. B., Bowditch R. D., Hemstreet G. P. III, Matrix-dependent plasticity of the malignant phenotype of bladder cancer cells. Anticancer Res 23, 3119– 3128 (2003). 12926044 PMC2561328
  41. [41]Jankowski J. A., Harrison R. F., Perry I., Balkwill F., Tselepis C., Barrett's metaplasia. Lancet 356, 2079– 2085 (2000). 11145505
  42. [42]Tselepis C., Perry I., Dawson C., Hardy R., Darnton S. J., McConkey C., Stuart R. C., Wright N., Harrison R., Jankowski J. A., Tumour necrosis factor-α in Barrett's oesophagus: A potential novel mechanism of action. Oncogene 21, 6071– 6081 (2002). 12203119
  43. [43]Balkwill F., Mantovani A., Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet 357, 539– 545 (2001). 11229684
  44. [44]Mantovani A., Allavena P., Sica A., Balkwill F., Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454, 436– 444 (2008). 18650914
  45. [45]Dziki J. L., Wang D. S., Pineda C., Sicari B. M., Rausch T., Badylak S. F., Solubilized extracellular matrix bioscaffolds derived from diverse source tissues differentially influence macrophage phenotype. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 105, 138– 147 (2017). 27601305
  46. [46]Keane T. J., Dziki J., Sobieski E., Smoulder A., Castleton A., Turner N., White L. J., Badylak S. F., Restoring mucosal barrier function and modifying macrophage phenotype with an extracellular matrix hydrogel: Potential therapy for ulcerative colitis. J. Crohns Colitis 11, 360– 368 (2017). 27543807
  47. [47]Nieponice A., McGrath K., Qureshi I., Beckman E. J., Luketich J. D., Gilbert T. W., Badylak S. F., An extracellular matrix scaffold for esophageal stricture prevention after circumferential EMR. Gastrointest. Endosc. 69, 289– 296 (2009). 18657808
  48. [48]Nieponice A., Gilbert T. W., Badylak S. F., Reinforcement of esophageal anastomoses with an extracellular matrix scaffold in a canine model. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 82, 2050– 2058 (2006). 17126109
  49. [49]Nieponice A., Ciotola F. F., Nachman F., Jobe B. A., Hoppo T., Londono R., Badylak S., Badaloni A. E., Patch esophagoplasty: Esophageal reconstruction using biologic scaffolds. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 97, 283– 288 (2014). 24266951
  50. [50]Badylak S. F., Hoppo T., Nieponice A., Gilbert T. W., Davison J. M., Jobe B. A., Esophageal preservation in five male patients after endoscopic inner-layer circumferential resection in the setting of superficial cancer: A regenerative medicine approach with a biologic scaffold. Tissue Eng. Part A 17, 1643– 1650 (2011). 21306292 PMC3098955
  51. [51]Dua K. S., Hogan W. J., Aadam A. A., Gasparri M., In-vivo oesophageal regeneration in a human being by use of a non-biological scaffold and extracellular matrix. Lancet 388, 55– 61 (2016). 27068836
  52. [52]Saldin L. T., Cramer M. C., Velankar S. S., White L. J., Badylak S. F., Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: Structure and function. Acta Biomater. 49, 1– 15 (2017). 27915024 PMC5253110
  53. [54]Wolf M. T., Daly K. A., Brennan-Pierce E. P., Johnson S. A., Carruthers C. A., D'Amore A., Nagarkar S. P., Velankar S. S., Badylak S. F., A hydrogel derived from decellularized dermal extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 33, 7028– 7038 (2012). 22789723 PMC3408574
  54. [55]Wiśniewski J. R., Zougman A., Nagaraj N., Mann M., Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359– 362 (2009). 19377485
  55. [56]Pratt J. M., Simpson D. M., Doherty M. K., Rivers J., Gaskell S. J., Beynon R. J., Multiplexed absolute quantification for proteomics using concatenated signature peptides encoded by QconCAT genes. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1029– 1043 (2006). 17406340
  56. [57]Calle E. A., Hill R. C., Leiby K. L., Le A. V., Gard A. L., Madri J. A., Hansen K. C., Niklason L. E., Targeted proteomics effectively quantifies differences between native lung and detergent-decellularized lung extracellular matrices. Acta Biomater. 46, 91– 100 (2016). 27693690 PMC5451113
  57. [58]Goddard E. T., Hill R. C., Nemkov T., D'Alessandro A., Hansen K. C., Maller O., Mongoue-Tchokote S., Mori M., Partridge A. H., Borges V. F., Schedin P., The rodent liver undergoes weaning-induced involution and supports breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Discov. 7, 177– 187 (2017). 27974414 PMC5459606
  58. [59]MacLean B., Tomazela D. M., Shulman N., Chambers M., Finney G. L., Frewen B., Kern R., Tabb D. L., Liebler D. C., MacCoss M. J., Skyline: An open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966– 968 (2010). 20147306 PMC2844992
  59. [60]Chong J., Soufan O., Li C., Caraus I., Li S., Bourque G., Wishart D. S., Xia J., MetaboAnalyst 4.0: Towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W486– W494 (2018). 29762782 PMC6030889

Authors
Naranjo, J. D., Saldin, L. T., Sobieski, E., Quijano, L. M., Hill, R. C., Chan, P. G., Torres, C., Dziki, J. L., Cramer, M. C., Lee, Y. C., Das, R., Bajwa, A. K., Nossair, R., Klimak, M., Marchal, L., Patel, S., Velankar, S. S., Hansen, K. C., McGrath, K., & Badylak, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • UPMC Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Badylak, Stephen F.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2020-07-03
Volume
6
Issue
27
Pages
eaba4526-eaba4526
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040581353
Cited by
38
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-14-1-0723)
  • National Cancer Institute (F31CA210694)
  • Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh (UL1TR001857)
  • BARD
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
Barrett's esophagus, extracellular matrix hydrogel, metaplasia, mucoadhesive hydrogels, inflammation, canine model, tissue engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review