Cited by 69Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Dedifferentiation and neuronal repression define familial Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Caldwell, Andrew B., Liu, Qing, Schroth, Gary P., Galasko, Douglas R., Yuan, Shauna H., Wagner, Steven L., Subramaniam, Shankar·2020·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer’s Disease (EOFAD) is a dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder elicited by mutations in the PSEN1 , PSEN2 , and APP genes 1 . Hallmark pathological changes and symptoms observed, namely the accumulation of misfolded Amyloid-β (Aβ) in plaques and Tau aggregates in neurofibrillary tangles associated with memory loss and cognitive decline, are understood to be temporally accelerated manifestations of the more common sporadic Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease. The complete penetrance of EOFAD-causing mutations has allowed for experimental models which have proven integral to the overall understanding of AD 2 . However, the failure of pathology-targeting therapeutic development suggests that the formation of plaques and tangles may be symptomatic and not describe the etiology of the disease 3,4 . Here, we use an integrative, multi-omics approach and systems-level analysis in hiPSC-derived neurons to generate a mechanistic disease model for EOFAD. Using patient-specific cells from donors harboring mutations in PSEN1 differentiated into neurons, we characterize the disease-related gene expression and chromatin accessibility changes by RNA- Seq, ATAC-Seq, and histone methylation ChIP-Seq. We show that the defining disease-causing mechanism of EOFAD is dedifferentiation, primarily through the REST-mediated repression of neuronal lineage specification gene programs and the activation of non-specific germ layer precursor gene programs concomitant with modifications in chromatin accessibility. These gene signature profiles and changes in chromatin topology illustrate that EOFAD neurons traverse the chromatin landscape from an ectodermal origin to a mixed germ lineage state. Further, a reanalysis of existing transcriptomic data from PSEN1 patient brain samples demonstrates that the mechanisms identified in our experimental system recapitulate EOFAD in the human brain. Our results comprise a disease model which describes the mechanisms culminating in dedifferentiation that precede amyloid and tau pathology formation and engender neurodegeneration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aba5933

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 140 · Cited by 69

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]G. Korotkevich, V. Sukhov, A. Sergushichev, Fast gene set enrichment analysis. bioRxiv 060012 [Preprint]. 22 October 2019.
  2. [50]Garcia-Gutierrez P., Juarez-Vicente F., Wolgemuth D. J., Garcia-Dominguez M., Pleiotrophin antagonizes Brd2 during neuronal differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 127, 2554– 2564 (2014). 24695857 PMC4038947

Authors
Caldwell, A. B., Liu, Q., Schroth, G. P., Galasko, D. R., Yuan, S. H., Wagner, S. L., & Subramaniam, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California System (US)
  • Illumina (United States) (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Subramaniam, Shankar
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2020-11-13
Volume
6
Issue
46
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912665828
Cited by
69
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (STC CCF-0939370)
  • National Institutes of Health (P50 AGO5131, U01 NS 074501-05, R01 LM012595, U01 CA198941, U01 DK097430, R01 HD084633, R01 HL106579-07)
  • Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (multiple)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (RR&D 1I01RX002259)
  • Alzheimer’s Association (NIRG-14-322164)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease, chromatin topology, histone methylation, hiPSC-derived neurons, gene regulatory programs, disease endotypes
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Chromatin, Humans, Mutation, Neurons, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review