Dedifferentiation and neuronal repression define familial Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer’s Disease (EOFAD) is a dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder elicited by mutations in the PSEN1 , PSEN2 , and APP genes 1 . Hallmark pathological changes and symptoms observed, namely the accumulation of misfolded Amyloid-β (Aβ) in plaques and Tau aggregates in neurofibrillary tangles associated with memory loss and cognitive decline, are understood to be temporally accelerated manifestations of the more common sporadic Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease. The complete penetrance of EOFAD-causing mutations has allowed for experimental models which have proven integral to the overall understanding of AD 2 . However, the failure of pathology-targeting therapeutic development suggests that the formation of plaques and tangles may be symptomatic and not describe the etiology of the disease 3,4 . Here, we use an integrative, multi-omics approach and systems-level analysis in hiPSC-derived neurons to generate a mechanistic disease model for EOFAD. Using patient-specific cells from donors harboring mutations in PSEN1 differentiated into neurons, we characterize the disease-related gene expression and chromatin accessibility changes by RNA- Seq, ATAC-Seq, and histone methylation ChIP-Seq. We show that the defining disease-causing mechanism of EOFAD is dedifferentiation, primarily through the REST-mediated repression of neuronal lineage specification gene programs and the activation of non-specific germ layer precursor gene programs concomitant with modifications in chromatin accessibility. These gene signature profiles and changes in chromatin topology illustrate that EOFAD neurons traverse the chromatin landscape from an ectodermal origin to a mixed germ lineage state. Further, a reanalysis of existing transcriptomic data from PSEN1 patient brain samples demonstrates that the mechanisms identified in our experimental system recapitulate EOFAD in the human brain. Our results comprise a disease model which describes the mechanisms culminating in dedifferentiation that precede amyloid and tau pathology formation and engender neurodegeneration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neurons carrying aggressive familial AD mutations still show a similar phenotype when generated from iPSCs.
“However, neurons that carry aggressive familial AD mutations still show a similar phenotype when generated from iPSCs (Caldwell et al., 2020).”
From Age-dependent instability of mature neuronal fate in induced neurons from Alzheimer’s patients (2021) · cites this paper as Caldwell et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 140 · Cited by 69
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [14]G. Korotkevich, V. Sukhov, A. Sergushichev, Fast gene set enrichment analysis. bioRxiv 060012 [Preprint]. 22 October 2019.
- [50]Garcia-Gutierrez P., Juarez-Vicente F., Wolgemuth D. J., Garcia-Dominguez M., Pleiotrophin antagonizes Brd2 during neuronal differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 127, 2554– 2564 (2014). 24695857 PMC4038947
- Authors
- Caldwell, A. B., Liu, Q., Schroth, G. P., Galasko, D. R., Yuan, S. H., Wagner, S. L., & Subramaniam, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California System (US)
- Illumina (United States) (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Subramaniam, Shankar
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2020-11-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 46
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7673760
- OpenAlex
- W2912665828
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (STC CCF-0939370)
- National Institutes of Health (P50 AGO5131, U01 NS 074501-05, R01 LM012595, U01 CA198941, U01 DK097430, R01 HD084633, R01 HL106579-07)
- Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (multiple)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (RR&D 1I01RX002259)
- Alzheimer’s Association (NIRG-14-322164)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease, chromatin topology, histone methylation, hiPSC-derived neurons, gene regulatory programs, disease endotypes
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Chromatin, Humans, Mutation, Neurons, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review