Single-cell damagenome profiling unveils vulnerable genes and functional pathways in human genome toward DNA damage
Open accessAbstract
We report a novel single-cell whole-genome amplification method (LCS-WGA) that can efficiently capture spontaneous DNA damage existing in single cells. We refer to these damage-associated single-nucleotide variants as "damSNVs," and the whole-genome distribution of damSNVs as the damagenome. We observed that in single human neurons, the damagenome distribution was significantly correlated with three-dimensional genome structures. This nonuniform distribution indicates different degrees of DNA damage effects on different genes. Next, we identified the functionals that were significantly enriched in the high-damage genes. Similar functionals were also enriched in the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected by single-cell transcriptome of both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This result can be explained by the significant enrichment of high-damage genes in the DEGs of neurons for both AD and ASD. The discovery of high-damage genes sheds new lights on the important roles of DNA damage in human diseases and disorders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LCS-WGA can capture single-nucleotide variants from individual neurons.
“Based whole-genome amplification, LCS-WGA can capture single-nucleotide variants from individual neurons76.”
From Single-cell parallel analysis of DNA damage and transcriptome reveals selective genome vulnerability (2025) · cites this paper as [76]
Neuronal genomes have a non-random distribution of DNA damage.
“Neuronal genomes have a non-random distribution of DNA damage”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Zhu, Q., Niu, Y., Gundry, M., & Zong, C.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Qiangyuan
- Niu, Yichi
- Zong, Chenghang
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2021-07-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 27
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11060043
- OpenAlex
- W3174928786
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH Office of the Director (1DP2EB020399)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- DNA damage, single-cell whole genome amplification, single nucleotide variants, 3D genome organization, neurons, Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder, differentially expressed genes, gene function enrichment, human genome
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Alzheimer Disease, DNA Damage, Humans, Genome, Human, Gene Expression Profiling, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review