Cited by 56SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingAnimal Virus Infections Studies

Preclinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine PTX-COVID19-B

Open access
Liu, Jun, Budylowski, Patrick, Samson, Reuben, Griffin, Bryan D., Babuadze, Giorgi, Rathod, Bhavisha, Colwill, Karen, Abioye, Jumai A. +19 more·2022·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Safe and effective vaccines are needed to end the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Here we report the preclinical development of a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, PTX-COVID19-B. PTX-COVID19-B was chosen among three candidates after the initial mouse vaccination results showed that it elicited the strongest neutralizing antibody response against SARS-CoV-2. Further tests in mice and hamsters indicated that PTX-COVID19-B induced robust humoral and cellular immune responses and completely protected the vaccinated animals from SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung. Studies in hamsters also showed that PTX-COVID19-B protected the upper respiratory tract from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mouse immune sera elicited by PTX-COVID19-B vaccination were able to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs), including the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P.1 lineages. No adverse effects were induced by PTX-COVID19-B in both mice and hamsters. These preclinical results indicate that PTX-COVID19-B is safe and effective. Based on these results, PTX-COVID19-B was authorized by Health Canada to enter clinical trials in December 2020 with a phase 1 clinical trial ongoing ( ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04765436 ). One Sentence Summary PTX-COVID19-B is a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine that is highly immunogenic, safe, and effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice and hamsters and is currently being evaluated in human clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abj9815

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 56

Authors
Liu, J., Budylowski, P., Samson, R., Griffin, B. D., Babuadze, G., Rathod, B., Colwill, K., Abioye, J. A., Schwartz, J. A., Law, R., Yip, L., Ahn, S. K., Chau, S., Naghibosadat, M., Arita, Y., Hu, Q., Yue, F. Y., Banerjee, A., Hardy, W. R., Mossman, K., Mubareka, S., Kozak, R. A., Pollanen, M. S., Martin Orozco, N., Gingras, A.-C., Marcusson, E. G., & Ostrowski, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Hospital (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Providence Therapeutics Holdings Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Jun
  • Budylowski, Patrick
  • Samson, Reuben
  • Marcusson, Eric G.
  • Ostrowski, Mario A.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2022-01-21
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
eabj9815-eabj9815
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220971507
Cited by
56
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HARVEST (University of Saskatchewan) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Royal Bank of Canada
  • Krembil Foundation
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (COVID-19)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticle formulation, neutralizing antibodies, humoral and cellular immune response, vaccine safety, variants of concern, hamster challenge model, mouse vaccination
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Canada, Cell Line, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Female, Cricetinae, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Liposomes, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Vaccines, Synthetic, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Th1 Cells, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Mice, Nanoparticles, Immunity, Humoral, Antibodies, Neutralizing, HEK293 Cells, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review