The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization: Evidence from randomized experiments

Santoro, Erik, Broockman, David E.·2022·Science Advances
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abn5515

Cited by (127)

Items 101–127 of 127

  1. List of Figures
    SARA BINZER HOBOLT, James R. Tilley · 2026 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  2. Tribal Bias: Seeing the World through a Brexit Lens
    SARA BINZER HOBOLT, James R. Tilley · 2026 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  3. List of Tables
    SARA BINZER HOBOLT, James R. Tilley · 2026 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  4. Conclusion
    SARA BINZER HOBOLT, James R. Tilley · 2026 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  5. The Trigger: The Brexit Referendum and its Fallout
    SARA BINZER HOBOLT, James R. Tilley · 2026 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  6. Identity Anchors: Tribes, Traits, and Echo Chambers
    SARA BINZER HOBOLT, James R. Tilley · 2026 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  7. Data Sources
    SARA BINZER HOBOLT, James R. Tilley · 2026 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  8. Reducing political polarization through conversations with artificial intelligence
    Timon M. J. Hruschka, Markus Appel · 2026 · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
  9. Family Contact Mitigates the Impact of Parent-Child Political Incongruence: Cross-Sectional and Diary Data from Post 2019 Hong Kong
    Branda Yee‐Man Yu, Katy Y. Y. Tam, Christian Shaunlyn Chan · 2026 · Emerging Adulthood
  10. Outnumbered Online: The Consequences of Partisan Imbalance in Online Political Discussions
    Alexander Volfovsky, Fatima Alqabandi, Tina LaChapelle, Christopher A. Bail, Andrew Trexler, Maxwell Allamong, D. Sunshine Hillygus · 2026 · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
  11. Spoken disagreement is more constructive than written disagreement
    Burint Bevis, Juliana Schroeder, Michael Yeomans · 2026 · Nature Communications
  12. Breaking Bread in a Relational Famine: Navigating Structural Violence Through Facilitated Discourse
    Aleem M. Bharwani · 2026 · Frontiers in international relations
  13. Increasing empathy and perspective-taking in controversial discussions: A systematic review and future research directions
    Charlotte Elisabeth Vaassen, Tijs Adriaan Van Den Broek, Hillie Aaldering, Bianca Beersma · 2026 · Computers in Human Behavior Reports
  14. When Politics Walk Into Work: Workplace Political Discourse and Organizational Consequences
    Lemaro R. Thompson · 2026 · Journal of Management Inquiry
  15. Partisan Social Norms, Racial Attitudes and Civic Discourse
    Emily Anne West · 2026 · Political Behavior
  16. Disagreement among friends: a collaboration-based framework for reducing polarization on climate change
    Mary C. McGrath · 2026 · Environmental Politics
  17. Perspective-Taking and Partisan Depolarization in the U.S. and Turkey
    Cansu Paksoy, Leonie Huddy · 2026 · Political Behavior
  18. Why Do Deliberative Discussions Reduce Affective Polarization? Evidence from a Deliberation Experiment in Honduras
    Eric Kramon · 2026 · Perspectives on Politics
  19. Contesting repression in divided democracies: Can counternarratives reduce support for police violence?
    Yanilda María González, Natán Skigin · 2026 · American Journal of Political Science
  20. AI Sycophancy and Decisions
    John J. Conlon, Peter Schwardmann · 2026 · SSRN Electronic Journal
  21. Beyond Single-Shot Designs: Repeated Treatments, Affective Polarization, and Democratic Norms
    Libby Jenke · 2026 · Journal of Experimental Political Science
  22. Interpersonal political discussion and affective polarization: Comparative evidence from 41 elections and five panel studies
    Mariano Torcal, Paul A. Beck · 2026 · Electoral Studies
  23. Toward an integrated and globally equitable understanding of political polarization
    Max Falkenberg, Matteo Cinelli, Alessandro Galeazzi, Christopher A. Bail, R. M. Benito, Axel Bruns, Anatoliy A. Gruzd, David Lazer, Jae Kook Lee, Jennifer McCoy et al. · 2026 · Nature Communications
  24. Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Natural Experiment
    Dazhong Sun · 2026 · Social Science Quarterly
  25. Conversation Without Conversion: Evidence from Cross-Partisan Interactions on a Mobile Chat Platform
    Diana Jordan · 2026 · Political Behavior
  26. Do Political Conversations Persuade or Polarize? Evidence From a Real-Time Randomized Experiment
    Omer Ben Simhon, Eran Amsalem · 2026 · Communication Research
  27. Evaluating an In-Person Depolarization Program and Testing a Light-Touch Enhancement
    Mark John Brandt, Jerad Morey · 2026 · Social Psychology