Cited by 14Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Cancer-driving mutations are enriched in genic regions intolerant to germline variation

Open access
Vitsios, Dimitrios, Dhindsa, Ryan S., Matelska, Dorota, Mitchell, Jonathan, Zou, Xuequing, Armenia, Joshua, Hu, Fengyuan, Wang, Quanli +3 more·2022·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Large reference datasets of protein-coding variation in human populations have allowed us to determine which genes and genic subregions are intolerant to germline genetic variation. There is also a growing number of genes implicated in severe Mendelian diseases that overlap with genes implicated in cancer. We hypothesized that cancer-driving mutations might be enriched in genic subregions that are depleted of germline variation relative to somatic variation. We introduce a new metric, OncMTR (oncology missense tolerance ratio), which uses 125,748 exomes in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) to identify these genic subregions. We demonstrate that OncMTR can significantly predict driver mutations implicated in hematologic malignancies. Divergent OncMTR regions were enriched for cancer-relevant protein domains, and overlaying OncMTR scores on protein structures identified functionally important protein residues. Last, we performed a rare variant, gene-based collapsing analysis on an independent set of 394,694 exomes from the UK Biobank and find that OncMTR markedly improves genetic signals for hematologic malignancies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abo6371

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vitsios, D., Dhindsa, R. S., Matelska, D., Mitchell, J., Zou, X., Armenia, J., Hu, F., Wang, Q., Sidders, B., Harper, A. R., & Petrovski, S.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vitsios, Dimitrios
  • Dhindsa, Ryan S.
  • Petrovski, Slavé
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2022-08-26
Volume
8
Issue
34
Pages
eabo6371-eabo6371
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293155700
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
cancer driver mutations, somatic variation, hematologic malignancies, protein domains, rare variants, gnomAD, UK Biobank, protein structure
MeSH terms
Germ Cells, Humans, Germ-Line Mutation, Hematologic Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review