Cited by 6Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Materials Characterization Techniques

Bridging electron microscopy and materials analysis with an autonomous agentic platform

Open access
Chen, Guangyao, Yuan, Wenhao, You, Fengqi·2026·Science Advances

Abstract

Electron microscopy (EM) reveals atomic-scale structures that underpin catalysis, energy storage, and semiconductor reliability, yet current workflows remain fragmented across segmentation, crystallographic reconstruction, property modeling, and literature review, often requiring weeks of expert effort. Although recent artificial intelligence models have assisted individual steps, the diversity of EM modalities and tasks means existing approaches remain siloed and perform poorly in complex multistage workflows. We present EMSeek, a modular, provenance-tracked multiagent platform that connects EM to materials insight through five key units: reference-guided one-for-all segmentation, mask-aware reconstruction of crystal structures from EM data, a gated mixture of experts property predictor with uncertainty calibration, literature retrieval with citation anchoring, and physical consistency checks with audit-ready reporting. These units are orchestrated by large language models (LLMs) that automatically plan, invoke, and execute tools, minimizing human intervention. On 20 material systems and five tasks, EMSeek delivers segmentation about twice as fast as Segment Anything with higher accuracy, achieves more than 90% structural similarity on STEM2Mat, and, with about 2% labeled calibration, matches or surpasses strong single experts on three out-of-distribution property benchmarks. A complete query runs in 2 to 5 minutes per image, roughly 50 times faster than expert workflows. Case studies on two-dimensional lattices and nanoparticles validate EMSeek’s ability to automate complex workflows, with integrated uncertainty calibration and audit signals that provide scientists with rigorous yet actionable guidance to accelerate materials discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aed0583

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chen, G., Yuan, W., & You, F.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
You, Fengqi
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2026-04-03
Volume
12
Issue
14
Pages
eaed0583-eaed0583
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7147509872
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2345579)
  • Schmidt Sciences (Eric and Wendy Schmidt AI in Science Postdoctoral Fellowship)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
Keywords
electron microscopy, large language models, automated image segmentation, materials property prediction, mixture of experts, uncertainty calibration, literature searching, provenance tracking, materials discovery, two-dimensional lattice, nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review