Metazoan diversification characterized by elevated rates of evolution during the middle Ediacaran to earliest Cambrian
Open accessAbstract
To test causal hypotheses for the emergence of animal body plans, we analyze rates of molecular and phenotypic evolution across Opisthokonta, focusing on divergences within the Tonian-Ordovician interval. Both molecular and phenotypic rates increase through the Ediacaran, peaking in an Ediacaran and earliest Cambrian interval before declining thereafter. Partitioning phenotypic characters into categories relating to development, feeding, fossilization potential, locomotion, and nervous systems reveals distinct temporal patterns, with developmental traits contributing disproportionately to elevated rates in the metazoan stem lineage. Rate patterns show a temporal lag between the ecological changes integral to hypotheses of developmental evolution and the Cambrian agronomic, substrate, and information revolutions and earlier peaks in the evolution of the associated phenotypic characters. These patterns are largely independent of the timescale used. Overall, our results indicate that the primary phase of elevated evolutionary novelty occurred during the Ediacaran and culminated in the late Ediacaran-earliest Cambrian, providing the foundation for later ecological and taxonomic innovation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Cambrian explosion: Animals or fossils?
Runnegar, B. (1982) · Journal of the Geological Society of Australia · doi:10.1080/00167618208729222 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Guo, Z., Roper-Smith, T. J., Clark, J. W., Paps, J., Wu, R., Pisani, D., & Donoghue, P. C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of Bath (GB)
- Bristol Palaeobiology Group, Schools of Earth and Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Zhiqing
- Donoghue, Philip C. J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2026-10-30
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- eaeh7099-eaeh7099
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7213715933
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/Y003624/1; BB/T012773/1)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P013678/1)
- Leverhulme Trust (RF-2022-167, RPG-2024-030)
- China Scholarship Council (202306760010, 202006340013)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- metazoan diversification, evolutionary rates, Ediacaran, Cambrian, Opisthokonta, molecular evolution, phenotypic evolution, evolutionary developmental biology, Cambrian explosion, evolutionary innovation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Phenotype, Phylogeny
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review