The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stereotaxic Apparatus for Operations on the Human Brain
Abstract
Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide with a 5-year survival rate of less than 50%. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is frequently implicated in HNC. Recently, IQ motif–containing GTPase-activating protein 1 (IQGAP1) was discovered to scaffold the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. IQGAP1 gene expression is increased in HNC, raising the hypothesis that IQGAP1 contributes to HNC. Experimental Design: We performed a combination of in vitro studies using human cancer cell lines treated with a cell-permeable peptide that interferes with IQGAP1′s ability to bind to PI3K, and in vivo studies utilizing mice genetically knocked out for the Iqgap1 (Iqgap1−/−). In vivo EGF stimulation assays were used to evaluate PI3K signaling. To study the role of IQGAP1 in HNC, we used a well-validated mouse model that drives HNC via a synthetic oral carcinogen, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4NQO). Results: IQGAP1 is necessary for efficient PI3K signaling in vitro and in vivo. Disruption of IQGAP1-scaffolded PI3K/AKT signaling reduced HNC cell survival. Iqgap1−/− mice had significantly lower cancer incidences, lesser disease severity, and fewer cancer foci. IQGAP1 protein levels were increased in HNC arising in Iqgap1+/+ mice. The level of PI3K signaling in 4NQO-induced HNC arising in Iqgap1−/− mice was significantly reduced, consistent with the hypothesis that IQGAP1 contributes to HNC at least partly through PI3K signaling. High IQGAP1 expression correlated with reduced survival, and high pS6 levels correlated with high IQGAP1 levels in patients with HNC. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that IQGAP1 contributes to head and neck carcinogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE CEREBELLUM EXAMINED BY A NEW METHOD.
HORSLEY, V., & CLARKE, R. H. (1908) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/31.1.45 · Cited by 783
Cited by
Leksell's posteroventral pallidotomy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease
Laitinen, L. V., Bergenheim, A. T., & Hariz, M. I. (1992) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1992.76.1.0053 · Cited by 1,081
Perlmutter, J. S., & Mink, J. W. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112824 · Cited by 1,073
Translational principles of deep brain stimulation
Kringelbach, M. L., Jenkinson, N., Owen, S. L. F., & Aziz, T. Z. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2196 · Cited by 853
Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism
Hayes, M. T. (2019) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.001 · Cited by 823
Probing and regulating dysfunctional circuits using deep brain stimulation
Lozano, A. M., & Lipsman, N. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.020 · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiegel, E. A., Wycis, H. T., Marks, M., & Lee, A. J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1947-10-10
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2754
- Pages
- 349-350
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2064761900
- Cited by
- 982
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereotaxic Apparatus for Operations on the Human Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.106.2754.349
- The paper
- Spiegel, E. A., Wycis, H. T., Marks, M., & Lee, A. J. (1947). Stereotaxic Apparatus for Operations on the Human Brain. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.106.2754.349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.