The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Devil in the Detail
Abstract
Global surface temperatures have increased by 0.6 � 0.2°C in the last century, but this warming has not been evenly distributed across the globe. Some regions, such as the Antarctic Peninsula, have seen a higher than average warming. In their Perspective, Vaughan et al. show that the recent warming in the Antarctic Peninsula has likely been exceptional for 1900 years. Yet global circulation models are unable to reproduce this warming. They conclude that properly targeted national adaptation planning requires a better understanding of regionally specific climate processes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mass Balance of Polar Ice Sheets
Rignot, E., & Thomas, R. H. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1073888 · Cited by 466
Chavan, P., Warren, J., Brubaker, M., & Berner, J. (2013) · ISCORD 2013 · doi:10.1061/9780784412978.007 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaughan, D. G., Marshall, G. J., Connolley, W. M., King, J. C., & Mulvaney, R.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2001-09-07
- Volume
- 293
- Issue
- 5536
- Pages
- 1777-1779
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1553871952
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Devil in the Detail. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1065116
- The paper
- Vaughan, D. G., Marshall, G. J., Connolley, W. M., King, J. C., & Mulvaney, R. (2001). Devil in the Detail. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
