The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid Regulation of Light Harvesting and Plant Fitness in the Field
Abstract
We used Arabidopsis thaliana mutants to examine how a photosynthetic regulatory process, the qE-type or ΔpH-dependent nonphotochemical quenching, hereafter named feedback de-excitation, influences plant fitness in different light environments. We show that the feedback de-excitation is important for plant fitness in the field and in fluctuating light in a controlled environment but that it does not affect plant performance under constant light conditions. Our findings demonstrate that the feedback de-excitation confers a strong fitness advantage under field conditions and suggest that this advantage is due to the increase in plant tolerance to variation in light intensity rather than tolerance to high-intensity light itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tomaz, T., Bagard, M., Pracharoenwattana, I., Lindén, P., Lee, C. P., Carroll, A. J., Ströher, E., Smith, S. M., Gardeström, P., & Millar, A. H. (2010) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.161612 · Cited by 264
Chloroplast Accumulation Response Enhances Leaf Photosynthesis and Plant Biomass Production
Gotoh, E., Suetsugu, N., Yamori, W., Ishishita, K., Kiyabu, R., Fukuda, M., Higa, T., Shirouchi, B., & Wada, M. (2018) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.18.00484 · Cited by 128
Multiscale model of light harvesting by photosystem II in plants
Amarnath, K., Bennett, D. I. G., Schneider, A. R., & Fleming, G. R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524999113 · Cited by 88
Bennett, D. I. G., Fleming, G. R., & Amarnath, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1806597115 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Külheim, C., Ågren, J., & Jansson, S.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2002-07-05
- Volume
- 297
- Issue
- 5578
- Pages
- 91-93
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2089369878
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
