The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Containing Bioterrorist Smallpox
Abstract
The need for a planned response to a deliberate introduction of smallpox has recently become urgent. We constructed a stochastic simulator of the spread of smallpox in structured communities to compare the effectiveness of mass vaccination versus targeted vaccination of close contacts of cases. Mass vaccination before smallpox introduction or immediately after the first cases was more effective than targeted vaccination in preventing and containing epidemics if there was no prior herd immunity (that is, no prior immunologic protection within the population). The effectiveness of postrelease targeted and mass vaccinations increased if we assumed that there was residual immunity in adults vaccinated before 1972, but the effectiveness of targeted vaccination increased more than that of mass vaccination. Under all scenarios, targeted vaccination prevented more cases per dose of vaccine than did mass vaccination. Although further research with larger-scale structured models is needed, our results suggest that increasing herd immunity, perhaps with a combination of preemptive voluntary vaccination and vaccination of first responders, could enhance the effectiveness of postattack intervention. It could also help targeted vaccination be more competitive with mass vaccination at both preventing and containing a deliberate introduction of smallpox.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable
Fraser, C., Riley, S., Anderson, R. M., & Ferguson, N. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307506101 · Cited by 1,144
Transmissibility of 1918 pandemic influenza
Mills, C. E., Robins, J. M., & Lipsitch, M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03063 · Cited by 796
When individual behaviour matters: homogeneous and network models in epidemiology
Bansal, S., Grenfell, B. T., & Meyers, L. A. (2007) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1100 · Cited by 722
A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies
Brennan, A., Chick, S. E., & Davies, R. (2006) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1148 · Cited by 555
Appropriate Models for the Management of Infectious Diseases
Wearing, H. J., Rohani, P., & Keeling, M. J. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020174 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Halloran, M. E., Longini, I. M., Nizam, A., & Yang, Y.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2002-11-15
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 5597
- Pages
- 1428-1432
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2099810380
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Containing Bioterrorist Smallpox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1074674
- The paper
- Halloran, M. E., Longini, I. M., Nizam, A., & Yang, Y. (2002). Containing Bioterrorist Smallpox. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074674
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.