The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ideal Pure Shear Strength of Aluminum and Copper
Abstract
Although aluminum has a smaller modulus in {111}〈112̄〉 shear than that of copper, we find by first-principles calculation that its ideal shear strength is larger because of a more extended deformation range before softening. This fundamental behavior, along with an abnormally high intrinsic stacking fault energy and a different orientation dependence on pressure hardening, are traced to the directional nature of its bonding. By a comparative analysis of ion relaxations and valence charge redistributions in aluminum and copper, we arrive at contrasting descriptions of bonding characteristics in these two metals that can explain their relative strength and deformation behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Cited by
Ab initio calculation of ideal strength and phonon instability of graphene under tension
Liu, F., Ming, P., & Li, J. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.064120 · Cited by 1,447
Self-citationSize dependence of nanostructures: Impact of bond order deficiency
Sun, C. Q. (2007) · Progress in Solid State Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2006.03.001 · Cited by 873
Ideal shear strain of metals and ceramics
Ogata, S., Li, J., Hirosaki, N., Shibutani, Y., & Yip, S. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.104104 · Cited by 386
Self-citationChoudhuri, D., Srinivasan, S. G., Gibson, M. A., Zheng, Y., Jaeger, D. L., Fraser, H. L., & Banerjee, R. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02112-z · Cited by 384
Wang, K., Shang, S.-L., Wang, Y., Vivek, A., Daehn, G., Liu, Z.-K., & Li, J. (2020) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108306 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogata, S., Li, J., & Yip, S.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2002-10-25
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 5594
- Pages
- 807-811
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2094818644
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideal Pure Shear Strength of Aluminum and Copper. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1076652
- The paper
- Ogata, S., Li, J., & Yip, S. (2002). Ideal Pure Shear Strength of Aluminum and Copper. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076652
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
