The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moore's Law Forever?
Abstract
According to Moore9s law, the number of transistors on a chip should double in each technology generation. For more than 30 years, compliance with this law has been driven by the shrinking of transistor dimensions. But as Lundstrom explains in his Perspective, device physics and the limitations of existing materials pose restrictions on how far transistor dimensions can be reduced. Moore9s law may nevertheless survive as device engineers build layers of devices on chips or use new approaches such as molecular electronics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alternative Plasmonic Materials: Beyond Gold and Silver
Naik, G. V., Shalaev, V. M., & Boltasseva, A. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201205076 · Cited by 2,373
Controlled nanoscale doping of semiconductors via molecular monolayers
Ho, J. C., Yerushalmi, R., Jacobson, Z. A., Fan, Z., Alley, R. L., & Javey, A. (2008) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2058 · Cited by 361
(2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 125
Photonic Matrix Computing: From Fundamentals to Applications
Cheng, J., Zhou, H., & Dong, J. (2021) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano11071683 · Cited by 76
Quality Improvement: Science and Action
Ting, H. H., Shojania, K. G., Montori, V. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.768895 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundstrom, M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2003-01-10
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 5604
- Pages
- 210-211
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1584937917
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moore's Law Forever? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1079567
- The paper
- Lundstrom, M. (2003). Moore's Law Forever? Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
