The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Informatics and Quantitative Analysis in Biological Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Biological imaging is now a quantitative technique for probing cellular structure and dynamics and is increasingly used for cell-based screens. However, the bioinformatics tools required for hypothesis-driven analysis of digital images are still immature. We are developing the Open Microscopy Environment (OME) as an informatics solution for the storage and analysis of optical microscope image data. OME aims to automate image analysis, modeling, and mining of large sets of images and specifies a flexible data model, a relational database, and an XML-encoded file standard that is usable by potentially any software tool. With this design, OME provides a first step toward biological image informatics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology
Allan, C., Burel, J.-M., Moore, J., Blackburn, C., Linkert, M., Loynton, S., MacDonald, D., Moore, W. J., Neves, C., Patterson, A., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1896 · Cited by 653
Self-citationExtensible visualization and analysis for multidimensional images using Vaa3D
Peng, H., Bria, A., Zhou, Z., Iannello, G., & Long, F. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.011 · Cited by 315
Compound Classification Using Image‐Based Cellular Phenotypes
Adams, C. L., Kutsyy, V., Coleman, D. A., Cong, G., Crompton, A. M., Elias, K. A., Oestreicher, D. R., Trautman, J. K., & Vaisberg, E. (2006) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(06)14024-0 · Cited by 51
Wang, T., Li, G., Wang, D., Li, F., Men, D., Hu, T., Xi, Y., & Zhang, X.-E. (2019) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c9nr01105f · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Swedlow, J. R., Goldberg, I., Brauner, E., & Sorger, P. K.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2003-04-04
- Volume
- 300
- Issue
- 5616
- Pages
- 100-102
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2147385427
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
