The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Real-Time Quantum Feedback Control of Atomic Spin-Squeezing
Abstract
Real-time feedback performed during a quantum nondemolition measurement of atomic spin-angular momentum allowed us to influence the quantum statistics of the measurement outcome. We showed that it is possible to harness measurement backaction as a form of actuation in quantum control, and thus we describe a valuable tool for quantum information science. Our feedback-mediated procedure generates spin-squeezing, for which the reduction in quantum uncertainty and resulting atomic entanglement are not conditioned on the measurement outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum Measurement and Control
Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813948 · Cited by 2,119
Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons
Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O'Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138007 · Cited by 735
Metadata
- Authors
- Geremia, J., Stockton, J. K., & Mabuchi, H.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2004-04-09
- Volume
- 304
- Issue
- 5668
- Pages
- 270-273
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2102566435
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-Time Quantum Feedback Control of Atomic Spin-Squeezing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1095374
- The paper
- Geremia, J., Stockton, J. K., & Mabuchi, H. (2004). Real-Time Quantum Feedback Control of Atomic Spin-Squeezing. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095374
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
