A New Period for the Geologic Time Scale
Open accessAbstract
The geologic time scale stands as a major achievement of 19th-century science, a coherent record of our planet’s history fashioned from myriad details of individual rock outcroppings. The eras, periods, and finer divisions of the scale not only codify geologic time, they reflect our accumulated understanding of Earth’s past—or at least its more recent past. The Cambrian Period, with its fossil record of animal diversification, began only 543 million years ago (Ma), when Earth was already 4000 million years old (see the figure). In the 19th century and for much of the 20th century, the beginning of the Cambrian (also the beginning of the Paleozoic era and the Phanerozoic eon) marked the most distant temporal reaches of Earth’s tractable historical record. The absence of skeletonized fossils that mark Phanerozoic time made Precambrian rocks difficult to correlate, and so the fine stratigraphic divisions of the younger record gave way to broad intervals that permitted only limited insight into foundational events of Earth history. In 1991, perhaps out of resignation, the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) approved a division of Precambrian time into eons, eras, and periods defined strictly by chronometric age, without reference to events recorded in sedimentary rocks. The eras stuck, but the proposed period names are seldom used. This tradition was swept aside in March this year with the approval by IUGS of an addition to the geologic time scale: the Ediacaran Per…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The genetic fossil record strongly supports the notion that the diversification of metazoans in general, and bilaterian metazoans in particular, occurred during the Ediacaran Period, 635-542 Myr ago.
“Here we have shown, using a variety of analyses and appropriately testing for biases that may have been introduced by the use of palaeontologically derived maxima, that the genetic fossil record strongly supports the notion that the diversification of metazoans in general, and bilaterian metazoans in particular, occurred during the Ediacaran Period, 635-542 Myr ago (Knoll et al. 2004, 2006).”
From The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records (2008) · cites this paper as Knoll et al. 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 8 · Cited by 280
- Authors
- Knoll, A. H., Walter, M. R., Narbonne, G. M., & Christie-Blick, N.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Queen's University (CA)
- N. Christie-Blick is in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2004-07-30
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 5684
- Pages
- 621-622
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1923889407
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
- Keywords
- geologic time scale, Precambrian stratigraphy, International Union of Geological Sciences, chronostratigraphy, Cambrian
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review