The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Left-Handed Mice Live in Right-Handed Worlds
Abstract
Many C57BL/6J inbred mice were tested for paw preference. In unbiased worlds, half were left-handed, and females were more strongly lateralized. In biased worlds, approximately 10 percent exhibited lateral preferences inconsistent with the world bias, and males were more strongly lateralized. Influences of world bias appear to be superimposed upon an already laterally dichotomized population. Initial left-right sense, it is posited, arises as an outcome of a seemingly random process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Action in the X-chromosome of the Mouse (Mus musculus L.)
LYON, M. F. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/190372a0 · Cited by 3,978
Cited by
Effects of intrauterine position on the behavior and genital morphology of litter‐bearing rodents
Clark, M. M., & Galef, B. G. (1998) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649809540709 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, R. L.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1975-01-17
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 4172
- Pages
- 181-184
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2031217837
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
