The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cybertools and Archaeology
Abstract
The need for service-oriented cyberinfrastructure (CI) has been reported (1–4). Further development of archiving and search tools to accommodate the explosive growth in many fields, particularly in biomedical research, has been emphasized. Archaeology often depends on archived data acquired by other researchers for other purposes, often long ago. Differences in recording protocols, terms, measurement units, and language are commonplace. Data are often obscurely archived and difficult to access, and policies regarding confidentiality vary considerably. Even when databases are accessible, they often differ in size, format, structure, and semantics and seem to defy fusion. In archaeology, research on the most important issues in today’s society—the evolution of culture, the growth in population, and the long-term interaction of cultures with their physical and biological environments—will remain impoverished in the absence of a new generation of cybertools.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These archaeologists seek to integrate archaeological data through and within 'cyberinfrastructures'.
“They seek to integrate archaeological data through and within “cyberinfrastructures” (Snow et al. 2006).”
From What We See, What We Don’t See: Data Governance, Archaeological Spatial Databases and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in an Age of Big Data (2020) · cites this paper as Snow et al. 2006
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1126/science.1110411 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1110410 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1112120 · DOI
- Maurer S. M., Firestone R. B., Scriver C. R., Nature405, 117 (2000). · DOI
- Childs S. T., Kinsey K., Costs of curating archeological collections: A study of repository fees in 2002 and 1997–98 (National Park Service, Washington, DC, 2003)(Tech. Rep. 1,.
- Childs S. T., Kinsey K., A survey of SHPO archeological report bibliographic systems, 2002 (National Park Service, Washington, DC, 2004)(Tech. Rep. 5,.
- Elmagarmid A., Rusinkiewicz M., Sheth A., Eds. Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999).
- Rodriguez M. A., Egenhofer M. J., IEEE (Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng.) Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.15, 442 (2003).
- Chau M. et al. paper presented at the Second Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE Computer Society Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '02) Portland OR 14 to 18 July 2002.
- NSDI (www.nsdipa.gr.jp/english/index.html).
- Giles C. L., Bollacker K., Lawrence S., Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (ACM Press, New York, 1998), pp. 89-98. · DOI
- Lawrence S., Giles C. L., Bollacker K., IEEE Comput.32(6), 67 (1999). · DOI
- Wang J. Z., Li J., Wiederhold G., IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell.23, 947 (2001)www-db.stanford.edu/∼wangz/project/imsearch/SIMPLIcity/TPAMI/). · DOI
- Lagoze C. Payette S. Shin E. Wilper C. Int. J. Digital Libr. in press; (draft available at http://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0501/0501012.pdf).
- Mitra P. Wiederhold G. Proceedings of ECAI 2002 the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Interoperability Lyon France 21 to 26 July 2002 (IOS Press Amsterdam 2002).
- Pike W. A. Ahlqvist O. Gahegan M. Oswal S. Workshop on Semantic Web Technologies for Searching and Retrieving Scientific Data at the Second International Semantic Web Conference Sanibel Island FL 20 to 23 October 2003; (http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-83/sia_1.pdf).
- Carroll M. S., Ed. Delivering Archaeological Information Electronically (Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC, 2002).
- Drennan R. D., Mora S., Eds. Archaeological Research and Heritage Preservation in the Americas (Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC, 2001).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeological Visualization: Towards an Archaeological Information Science (AISc)
Llobera, M. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-010-9098-4 · Cited by 110
Gupta, N., Blair, S., & Nicholas, R. (2020) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Snow, D. R., Gahegan, M., Giles, C. L., Hirth, K. G., Milner, G. R., Mitra, P., & Wang, J. Z.
- Affiliations
- Department of Anthropology
- Department of Geography
- School of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2006-02-17
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 5763
- Pages
- 958-959
- ISSN
- 0036-8075
- 1095-9203
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
