Cited by 118

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comment on "Protein Sequences from Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex Revealed by Mass Spectrometry"

Buckley, Mike, Walker, Angela, Ho, Simon Y. W., Yang, Yue, Smith, Colin, Ashton, Peter, Oates, Jane Thomas, Cappellini, Enrico, Koon, Hannah, Penkman, Kirsty, Elsworth, Ben, Ashford, Dave, Solazzo, Caroline, Andrews, Phillip, Strahler, John, Shapiro, Beth, Ostrom, Peggy, Gandhi, Hasand, Miller, Webb, Raney, Brian, Zylber, Maria Ines, Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Prigodich, Richard V., Ryan, Michael, Rijsdijk, Kenneth F., Janoo, Anwar, Collins, Matthew J.·2008·Science

Abstract

We used authentication tests developed for ancient DNA to evaluate claims by Asara et al . (Reports, 13 April 2007, p. 280) of collagen peptide sequences recovered from mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex fossils. Although the mastodon samples pass these tests, absence of amino acid composition data, lack of evidence for peptide deamidation, and association of α1(I) collagen sequences with amphibians rather than birds suggest that T. rex does not.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1147046

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The survival of ancient proteins in deep time has been linked to mineralized substrates.

    “what is known is that the survival of ancient proteins in deep time has been linked to mineralized substrates.”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [68]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. E. Willerslev, A. Cooper, Proc. R. Soc. London. B. Biol. Sci.272, 3 (2005).
  2. 10.1126/science.1137614 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1006/jasc.1995.0019 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77476-X · DOI
  6. K. R. Johnson, D. J. Nichols, J. H. Hartman, The Hell Creek Formation and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in the Northern Great Plains: Geological Society of America Special Paper361, 503–510 (2002).
  7. 10.1126/science.1138709 · DOI
  8. 10.1144/0016-76492006-070 · DOI
  9. 10.1128/iai.63.6.2173-2179.1995 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00239-002-2365-6 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.317.5843.1324 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1399-3011.2004.00151.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buckley, M., Walker, A., Ho, S. Y. W., Yang, Y., Smith, C., Ashton, P., Oates, J. T., Cappellini, E., Koon, H., Penkman, K., Elsworth, B., Ashford, D., Solazzo, C., Andrews, P., Strahler, J., Shapiro, B., Ostrom, P., Gandhi, H., Miller, W., Raney, B., Zylber, M. I., Gilbert, M. T. P., Prigodich, R. V., Ryan, M., Rijsdijk, K. F., Janoo, A., & Collins, M. J.
Affiliations
BioArch, Departments of Biology, Archaeology, Chemistry and Technology Facility, University of York, Post Office Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK.
Venue
Science
Published
2008-01-04
Volume
319
Issue
5859
Pages
33-33
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
118
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review