Cited by 9,084Graphene research and applicationsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research2D Materials and Applications

Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene

Open access
Nair, R. R., Blake, P., Grigorenko, A. N., Novoselov, K. S., Booth, T. J., Stauber, T., Peres, N. M. R., Geim, A. K.·2008·Science

Abstract

There are few phenomena in condensed matter physics that are defined only by the fundamental constants and do not depend on material parameters. Examples are the resistivity quantum, h/e2 (h is Planck's constant and e the electron charge), that appears in a variety of transport experiments and the magnetic flux quantum, h/e, playing an important role in the physics of superconductivity. By and large, sophisticated facilities and special measurement conditions are required to observe any of these phenomena. We show that the opacity of suspended graphene is defined solely by the fine structure constant, a = e2/hc � 1/137 (where c is the speed of light), the parameter that describes coupling between light and relativistic electrons and that is traditionally associated with quantum electrodynamics rather than materials science. Despite being only one atom thick, graphene is found to absorb a significant (pa = 2.3%) fraction of incident white light, a consequence of graphene's unique electronic structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1156965

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 2D Dirac system like single layer graphene, the optical conductance for interband transitions is G1(ω)=e^2/ħ, giving a frequency independent transmission quantized in terms of the fine structure constant α as T(ω)=1-πα.

    “This prediction is closely related to the prediction and observation in 2D Dirac system of single layer graphene that for interband transitions that its optical conductance should be G 1 ( ω ) = e 2 ℏ , giving a frequency independent transmission that is quantized in terms of the fine structure constant α as T ( ω ) = 1 -πα (Ando et al. , 2002; Kuzmenko et al. , 2008; Nair et al. , 2008).”

    From Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids (2018) · cites this paper as Nair et al. , 2008

    The ‘Universal dynamic conductivity of graphene’ section (p. 3) supports transmission set approximately by 1−πα for single-layer graphene under the stated photon-energy conditions. But it gives the universal optical conductance as e²/(4ℏ), not e²/ℏ; the same section (p. 4) also notes small finite-energy corrections to the idealized frequency-independent value. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Each layer of graphene can absorb ca. 2.3% of incident light.

    “each layer of graphene can absorb ca. 2.3% of incident light. [ 123 ]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 5 · Cited by 9,084

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]K. S. Novoselov et al , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 10451 (2005).
  2. [11]A. B. Kuzmenko et al , Phys. Rev. Lett. (2008) (see arXiv:0712.0835). · arXiv

Authors
Nair, R. R., Blake, P., Grigorenko, A. N., Novoselov, K. S., Booth, T. J., Stauber, T., Peres, N. M. R., & Geim, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Geim, A. K.
Venue
Science
Published
2008-06-06
Volume
320
Issue
5881
Pages
1308-1308
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2123510746
Cited by
9,084
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 212 · 2025: 354 · 2024: 412 · 2023: 474 · 2022: 547 · 2021: 649 · 2020: 650 · 2019: 708 · 2018: 684 · 2017: 708 · 2016: 728 · 2015: 670 · 2014: 648 · 2013: 535 · 2012: 440
FWCI
112.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E051227/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
Keywords
fine-structure constant, graphene, optical transparency, optical absorption, suspended graphene, fundamental physical constants, quantum electrodynamics, electronic structure, white light

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review